Transitional Justice definition

Transitional Justice means just that—provision of jus- tice in the transition to a government that administers jus- tice in the ordinary course of governing. Governments make choices even when administering justice, such as how to allo- cate scarce prosecutorial, judicial, police, and prison resources among ongoing issues of public safety, corruption, and other issues that taint and create obstacles to the rule of law. The goal is to make the rule of law ordinary. For Syria, like so many states, the rule of law will be an extraordinary achieve- ment and reality for many years to come if it is achieved at all. The longer the bloodletting continues, the harder the task of real nation-building will be, and the more likely it is that transitional justice will take a familiar Middle Eastern form: an eye for an eye, with interest compounded.

Split View

AI-Powered Contracts

Draft, Review & Redline at the Speed of AI

Get StartedSchedule a Demo

Transitional Justice. A Colonizing Field?,” Amsterdam Law Forum 4, no. 3 (2012): 66. 20 See ▇▇▇▇▇▇, “Empowerment or Imposition?,” 21.

Transitional Justice. A Tool of Elite Manipulation? A Constructivist Analysis of Gross-Abuse in Kenya and Rwanda The International Criminal Court’s Lack of Credibility: What Consequences for the Process of Convicting Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities? Salom´e Wyns 54-62 Call for Papers 63 Submission Guidelines 64-66

Examples of Transitional Justice in a sentence

• His allegation is not related to this case but Dr Clark gave this court a transcript of Robinson’s remarks made at the Oxford Transitional Justice Research Seminar on 22nd February 2010 (VB File 8, Page 3269).

• El ▇▇▇▇▇ (eds.), The International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011) ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, “Subjects and Objects: International Criminal Law and the Institutionalization of Civil Society,” International Journal of Transitional Justice 5(2) (2011) ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, “Managing a New ‘Partnership’: ‘Professionalization,’ Intermediaries and the International Criminal Court,” Criminal Law Forum 24(1) (2013) ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇.

• Building the Rule of Law After Military Interventions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006) Jane Stromseth, “Justice on the Ground: Can International Criminal Courts Strengthen Domestic Rule of Law in Post-Conflict Societies,” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 1 (2009) Jelena Subotić, Hijacked Justice: Dealing With the Past in the Balkans (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009) Jelena Subotić, “The Transformation of International Transitional Justice Advocacy,” Cass R.

• Teitel, Globalizing Transitional Justice: Contemporary Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014) David Tolbert and Aleksandar Kontic, “The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the transfer of cases and materials to national judicial authorities: lessons in complementarity,” in Carsten Stahn and Mohamed M.

• Transitional Justice, Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Reconciliation in Rwanda and Beyond (London: ▇▇▇▇▇ & Company, 2009).

• But again, if one does not provide a clear definition that follows coherently from the definition given by practitioners, Transitional Justice may end up including all of International Criminal Law.

• The goals of Transitional Justice are fundamentally tied to the aspiration of transition, both toward justice for past violations and toward a cementing of a new political order that will prevent the old order, with its attendant human rights violations, from returning.

• The Darker Side of Transitional Justice: The Power Dy- namics between Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts.

• In general, a successor regime using a model of Transitional Justice premised on political change will wish to maximize the perceived distance between it and the previous regime, but with a “composite act” such as forced disappearance, the successor regime may be considered responsible even if it did not initiate the wrongful act.91 91 See Art.

• A document prepared by ▇▇▇▇ describes SWAp as “bring[ing] together institutions with closely linked mandates of administering justice and maintaining law and order and human rights.”535 In 2008, JLOS established a high level Transitional Justice Working Group to “give effect to the provisions of the Juba Peace Agreement.”536 JLOS oversees the budgetary allocation of the ICD, a substantial portion of which, as discussed further below, relies on international donor support.

More Definitions of Transitional Justice

Transitional Justice means: Adequate, effective and prompt reparations to redress gross or serious violations of international human rights law, including but not limited to enslavement, genocide, racism, land theft, denial of healthcare, denial of housing, denial of economic opportunity, mass incarceration and other historical, systemic and ongoing injustices perpetrated by the State against Cambridge Residents.

Transitional Justice. The Comprehensive System of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Non-Repetition The JEP’s mixed approach: Between retributive and restorative justice

Transitional Justice means judicial procedures that take place during the difficult switch from war to peace or from dictatorship to democracy. In countries where the judicial apparatus is weak and/or where massive abuse has been perpetrated, transitional justice allows the implementation of processes of reconciliation, justice, compensation and the sharing of experiences with future generations; an example would be "truth commissions". http://198.170.242.9/french

Transitional Justice simply means an institutionalized allegation of abuse by the losing party in a conflict, even an allegation by a regime not in the process of transitioning to a superior approach toward human rights, it is unclear why “Transitional Justice” should retain its widespread support, or why the term would endure. This is not to say that Transitional Justice efforts have to be without flaw or criticism to merit the title of “Transitional Justice.” As a phenomenon associated with political 67 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, “Chicken and Egg? Sequencing in Transitional Justice: The Case of Uganda” (Autumn/Winter 2009) 14(2) International Journal of Peace Studies 35–53. 68 International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), “What is Transitional Justice” available at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/about/transitional-justice (accessed 27 May 2016). 69 ▇▇▇▇▇▇, “Transitional Justice Genealogy” 69. change, carried out by fallible humans, any instance of Transitional Justice will inevitably be flawed. Rather, calling an effort “Transitional Justice” should necessarily be an assertion that the substance of that effort contains the aspiration of transition to a new regime of accountability for human rights abuses. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ in What is Transitional Justice? begins and ends with a warning regarding broadening the scope of transitional justice.70 As she puts it: The risk of broadening the meaning of the concept is to dilute it and turning it into something meaningless. [. . .] The core element of transitional justice is here: offering a “toolbox” filled with elements designed to deal with the violations of human rights from a predecessor regime to form the basis of an order to prevent their reoccurrence.71 This is well put, although some might object to the “toolbox” metaphor given that it may tend to reduce complex problems to simpler plumbing analogues. The content of Transitional Justice is rooted in a transformative response to a predecessor regime’s human rights violations in order to prevent further violations.