Totality definition

Totality means that all elements in the domain or codomain of a relation are in a relation. See section 2.5 for more details. Recall that ℛ[+sib] is a shorthand notation that indicates a relation between the two sets [+sib] non-heads and [+sib] heads (ℛ[+sib]-[+sib-head]), so the two definitions are equivalent except for the domain of the correspondence relation. Notice that a tier φ with no φ-heads still violates RELATE-φ, since the constraint only considers one element at a time. This is the expected behavior for RELATE-I (or MAX) as well. A candidate may still violate RELATE-I even when there are no output root nodes. Because of symmetric inverse, I also predict the existence of a constraint RELATE- [+sib-head], where the domain is constituted by φ-heads. Such a constraint, however, is always vacuously satisfied. Simply put, a φ-head is always part of a correspondence domain because of the axiom on the head (xi). I better illustrate this point in § 2.4.1.1.
Totality. We say that Π has sabotaged (authenticated) t-totality if the following holds in the sabotaged (authenticated) setting when at most t parties are corrupted: Let ρ be the first round in which an honest party completes synchronization for some value v. Then, every honest party pi completes synchronization at some round ρi ≤ ρ + 1.
Totality if a correct node w validates a message m, then other correct nodes eventually validate m. We follow the authenticated double echo broadcast algorithm in[3]. The algorithm consists of three parts: broadcasting messages, echoing messages, and validating messages, which are shown in Algorithm 2, Algorithm 3, and Algorithm 4, respectively. Note that we assume full communication capability among nodes in this subsection, but it is not true in our model, we will explain how to solve this problem in Subsection C, Subsection D and Subsection E. Algorithm 2 Broadcast Message m = (source = u, round = k, value = vu ), Code for node u 1: Send (m, from = u, label = initial) to all nodes in the system. Algorithm 2 indicates how node u broadcasts a message m. It sends m to all other nodes in the system with a initial label. Algorithm 3 Echo Message m = (source = u, round = k, value = vu ), Code for node w ←⊥ 1: echow N ←⊥ 2: readyw N ( )

Examples of Totality in a sentence

  • Section I: Totality of Agreement: This contract incorporates the entire understanding of both parties on all issues which have been discussed during negotiations.

  • Section I: Totality of Agreement This contract incorporates the entire understanding of both parties on all issues that have been discussed during negotiations.

  • In the second part of The Symbol, titled The Expresser of National Totality (Kokumin zentaisei no hyōgensha) and written in 1945, Watsuji restates some of the key concepts present in The Reverence.

  • The Sentencing Council Definitive Guidelines on Offences Taken into Consideration and Totality clearly states that consecutive sentences will ordinarily be appropriate where any offence is committed within the prison context.

  • As he clearly states in Totality and Infinity: Intentional analysis is the search for the concrete.

  • Cancellation within 20 days prior to scheduled arrival date : Totality of the rental amount is due.

  • But prior to revealing the ethical self, we find that his phenomenological analysis proceeds in Section II of Totality and Infinity with an account of the separated or unique self in terms of sensibility, where his ultimate aim is to articulate how alterity is possible only starting from a separated “I”.28 That is, the “I” qua “I” is a separated “I”.

  • We will see that in Totality and Infinity, the work of justice functions as the way in which the ego is disengaged from self-interested being through an interruption or breach which the “encounter” with the face of the other person inaugurates.

  • Thus, not only is there no apprehension of sense data without susceptibility or vulnerability with regard to what one is exposed 92 Totality and Infinity, 86.

  • The apparently theological claims in Totality and Infinity can be understood phenomenologically as belonging to the description of the relationship between the self and a transcendent other.57 However, we wish to argue with ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ contention that in the first instance, ethical metaphysics should be understood phenomenologically rather than theologically.


More Definitions of Totality

Totality or “ZionVerse”) is a Limited Liability Company registered in Singapore. The Platform allows and facilitates acquiring of “Digital Collectible(s) or Collectible(s)” (Defined Below) through “Purchase” (Defined Below) or “Auction” (Defined Below). ZionVerse operates web applications, web services and platforms and mobile applications. ZionVerse reserves the right to change the Terms at any point in time, and the Terms will be updated on the website URL ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/. The user who agrees to the present Terms also agrees to all the subsequent changes in our Terms. These terms and conditions (“Terms”) of use govern the usage of the Totality Corp Pte. Ltd. (Referred to as “Us” or “We” or “Our” or the “Platform”) Platform by users (Referred to as "User" or "Users" or “You” or “Your”) who engage in trading of nonfungible tokens representing digital artwork, audio, images, and any other content and type of content that might be added to the Platform in the future (Collectively or in-part referred to as “Service” or “Services”). Digital Collectibles and/or Collectibles: A “Digital Collectible(s)” Or “Collectible(s)” presently is a nonfungible token implemented on the public blockchain platforms like Ethereum, Polygon, Solana using smart contracts (Referred to as “Smart Contracts” or “Byte Codes”) If you use the platform on behalf of a company or any other organization (“entity”), you, by agreeing to theseterms, confirm that you are fully authorized to bind such an entity to the warranties and obligations made under this agreement you also represent and warrant that you have the right, the authority, and the capacity to enter into an agreement on behalf of that entity. Any user who uses the ZionVerse Platform to trade, purchase, and access information on Digital Collectibles/non-fungible tokens/consume website content including but not limited to texts, audio, visual content, videos, and any other form of content is bound to agree to these Terms. Any user who does not agree to these Terms shall not access or use the Platform. Using the Platform (including applying for or opening a ZionVerse account) does not automatically mean that You will be entitled to enjoy full use of the Platform’s functionality (including bidding for NFTs at auction or purchasing NFTs) and/or that we will enter into any form of commercial or other arrangement with You, otherthan this Agreement. All the terms mentioned in this Agreement are intended to continue and shall survive ter...
Totality mentioned above is by no means a harmonic assembly of its constituent elements. Given the relations of production of a certain mode of production, there are inherent contradictions in the whole system. Any examination of human resources management must be sensitive to the structural contradictions of the whole. The conflict between those who own and/or manage production and those who sell their labour for pay is the source of the structural problems. Depending on the mode of production and the relations of production, these conflicts will take different forms; labour management relations and the development of human resources are conceptualised and operationalized within the framework of a totality riddled with contradictions, both at the organisational and societal levels.
Totality. , which means to the ensemble of historical processes in which historical action is embedded (see Touraine, 1981, as cited in Eder, 2015, 34).
Totality means that all elements in the domain or codomain of a relation are in a relation. See section 2.5 for more details. Because of symmetric inverse, I also predict the existence of a constraint RELATE- [+sib-head], where the domain is constituted by φ-heads. Such a constraint, however, is always vacuously satisfied. Simply put, a φ-head is always part of a correspondence domain because of the axiom on the head (xi). I better illustrate this point in § 2.4.1.1.