Task 1 definition
Task 1. Review the project scope.
Task 1. Arrange for the Provision of Medical Services
Task 1. Biometric Lab Program: We will perform activities toward the preparation of the Aviation Authority/CBP/TSA joint Biometric MCO Live Lab, planned for early 2024. We recognize there will be significant coordination requirements across all aspects. As such, we provide a considerable amount of effort through meetings and communications. The major activities include:
Examples of Task 1 in a sentence
The Task 1 Planning Phase Metrics Workbook submittal shall be completed to demonstrate that the design/specifications meet the Minimum Performance Requirements described above and data collected to the level of detail needed to estimate the energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) savings benefits.
NYSERDA requires that the information in the Metrics Workbook be updated at the Planning Phase (Task 1) and at the Completion Phase (Task 2) to confirm the energy savings from the project.
This task consists of all services necessary to take project from Task 1 Preliminary Design Services through the Final Design Services and may include the following itemized services.
The following format should be followed: Task 1: Progress for this reporting period: Identify any delays or problems encountered: Percentage of task completed: This report is submitted in accordance with the reporting requirements of the above DEP Agreement No. and accurately reflects the activities associated with the project.
A detailed cost analysis will be provided in the Deliverables for Task 1, prior to the Department issuing the “Notice to Commence.” All final Project Costs shall be submitted to the Department with the payment request.
More Definitions of Task 1
Task 1. Compilation of data: On the kick-off meeting it was decided not to transform all existing data into the same format, but using individual data sets depending on the research question. For instance, for Deliverable D4.3-1, all partners used their individual data to calculate metrics and to develop a new method on size-spectra (ISS). This approach turned out to be appropriate because of the different characteristics of the case study catchments, from which existing data is available. Task 2: Field campaign using standard methods: Altogether five case study catchments were included in the extensive field campaign: Lesina lagoon (Italy), Varna Bay (transitional/coastal area in the Black Sea (Bulgaria), the Mondego estuary (Portugal), the Basque coast (Atlantic coastal area in Spain) and the Oslo Fjord (Norway). All samples were taken in summer 2009 and processed. The taxa lists and environmental parameters were supplied to the central WISER database (workpackage 2.1).
Task 1. The contractor shall develop a finite element based analysis method to accurately capture the matrix splitting, fiber damage, and interlaminar delamination damage. The contractor shall, at a minimum, predict the localized damage under the impactor, shape and location of delamination between the ply interfaces, and the force response. The ability to include rate-sensitive material data, capture the physics of interacting failure mechanisms, and scale-up for large structural analysis are some of the important considerations in selecting an appropriate implementation of the finite element method, but there may be other considerations that the contractor is free to employ to improve the capabilities of the methods. If it is feasible within the budget and schedule of the program, the contractor is encouraged to show the likelihood of expanding this method for composite structures with damage arrestment features.
Task 1. Meet with City Staff and Legal Counsel. This is a crucial task that must be conducted so that our team is fully aware of the history of the mooring fields, the regulatory issues that the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has raised, the extent of the public awareness of the project, and how we will assist outside council in preparing the documents that he will need to meet with the Board of Trustees (BOT). During that initial meeting, our team will work with the City and ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to develop a list of tasks and time line for completing those tasks such that the deadlines established by the City and/ or FDEP are met. We will discuss whether public meetings and/or presentations to the City Council will be necessary, and if so, outline what may be required.
Task 1. Support the change readiness processes of the beneficiary organization to participate in the project: organize training workshops and/or coaching for beneficiary organizations to define the changes they want to see at the end of the training, which will strengthen organisational development competencies and enable them to start with their framework for organizational change. Activities can relate both to one organization and to a group of organizations, the whole staff of an organisation or part of the staff or key individuals within the organisation. Task 2. Conduct the organisational self-assessment to define skills and capacity gaps and define areas for performance improvement: conduct diagnostic study on organization’s performance in relation to performance improvement. These diagnostic activities are part of the project’s monitoring and evaluation framework. Specific activities will include: o Describing the area of organisational performance that the organisation wants to improve (what is the actual performance problem situation). o Describing why this performance is problematic (and explain how this hamper improved service delivery).
Task 1. Manager’s participate in a facilitated discussion of potential issues, concerns, interests, and priorities relative to mountain lions. Formal and informal discussions, icebreakers, and workshop sessions provide a forum for developing working relationships, establishing trust, and promoting improved understanding of the participants and their protected areas.
Task 1. Participate in kickoff meeting and organize a Technical Advisory Panel (TAP).
Task 1. Licensing (Annual Total: $9,840) To publish and maintain the data in Tableau Online, it will be necessary to purchase one “creator” license for Earth Economics, who will continue to hold and maintain the data. Access to the dashboard for WDFW, WDNR, Parks, and RCO staff will be via “viewer” licenses. During the first work week of each month, Earth Economics will manage agency licensing needs, activating and deactivating staff access as appropriate.