Examples of Table 14 in a sentence
The Exhibits listed in Table 1.4 contain additional information concerning the scope of the Software Subscriptions and how Red Hat provides Subscription Services to you.
Table 1.4 below lists the Software Subscriptions offered by Red Hat and the Unit descriptions that are used to measure your use of each Software Subscription.
You must purchase the appropriate number and type of JBoss xPaaS Subscription(s) for each Unit deployed on your premises or elsewhere based on the capacity of such Unit as described in Table 1.4. Multiple Software Subscriptions may be “stacked”.
Descriptions of Red Hat Software Subscriptions: Table 1.4 below lists the Software Subscriptions offered by Red Hat and the Unit descriptions that are used to measure your use of each Software Subscription.
Table 1.4 Software Subscription Unit Description (used to measure your use of Software Subscriptions) Exhibit Containing Additional Terms Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (Physical or Virtual Nodes) Physical Node: a physical system on which you install or execute all or a portion of the Software including, without limitation, a server, work station, laptop, blade or other physical system, as applicable: OR Virtual Node: an instance of the Software executed, in whole or in part, on a virtual machine.
Table 14 shows how vehicles belonging to each bin (according to the ground-truth data) were actually distributed by the dual-loop systems.
VEHS PERCENT Bin2 48 To Bin1 10 20.8% To Bin2 32 66.7% To Bin3 6 12.5% To Bin4 0 0% Bin3 33 To Bin1 0 0% To Bin2 0 0% To Bin3 15 45.5% To Bin4 18 54.5% Bin4 7 To Bin1 0 0% To Bin2 0 0% To Bin3 0 0% To Bin4 7 100% As shown in Table 14, dual-loop detectors sometimes incorrectly distributed Bin 2 vehicles into Bin 3.
You must purchase the appropriate number and type of JBoss OpenShift Container Platform Subscription(s) for each Unit deployed on your premises or elsewhere based on the capacity of such Unit as described in Table 1.4. Multiple Software Subscriptions may be “stacked”.
This method was attempted to see how results compared to the presence/absence logistic regression model used above, with the results presented in Table 14 and Table 15.
Pollutant BeTa (2002) CAFE CBA results (comparison case) Ratio NH3 No result 17,000 - NOx 4,500 6,300 1.4 PM2.5 10,000 48,000 4.8 SO2 4,600 9,800 2.13 VOCs 2,100 2,800 1.33 Table 14 repeats this exercise, but for the two ends of the ranges identified here.