Systematic review definition

Systematic review means a review of electronic WIC transactions by the state WIC agency or its representatives to monitor systematic violations of the program.

Split View

AI-Powered Contracts

Draft, Review & Redline at the Speed of AI

Get StartedSchedule a Demo

Systematic review means the application of strategies that limit bias in the assembly, critical appraisal, and synthesis of all relevant studies on a specific topic. Systematic reviews focus on peer-reviewed publications about a specific health problem and use rigorous, standardized methods for selecting and assessing articles. A systematic review differs from a meta-analysis in not including a quantitative summary of the results. However, a meta-analysis may be part of a systematic review.

Systematic review means an appraisal, analysis and synthesis of primary research publications using a rigorous and clearly documented methodology in both the strategy of searching for publications and the selection of material for inclusion. The documentation of the process and the decisions made allow the review to be reproduced and updated.6

Examples of Systematic review in a sentence

• Systematic review of 15 years of research on digital citizenship: 2004–2019.

• Systematic review Aims to aggregate, critically appraise, and synthesize in a single source all empirical evidence that meet a set of pre-specified eligibility criteria in order to answer in depth a clearly formulated research question to support evidence-based decision-making.

• Systematic review of long-term weight loss studies in obese adults: Clinical significance and applicability to clinical practice.

• Systematic review of behavioral interventions targeting social communication difficulties after traumatic brain injury.

• Risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence against women: Systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective–longitudinal studies.

• Systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine in low-income and lower-middle-income countries.

• Systematic review: the use of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic reso- ▇▇▇▇▇ imaging for the diagnosis, assessment of activity and abdominal complications of Crohn’s disease.

• Systematic review of patient and caregivers' satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patients' health.

• Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth.

• Systematic review and meta-regression of observational studies Dr ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Mathieson1, Dr Graeme Wertheimer3, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Maher1,2, Professor ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Lin1,2, Professor Andrew McLachlan2, Professor ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Buchbinder4,5, Professor ▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Pearson6, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Underwood7 Background: Guidelines now discourage opioid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain because the benefits frequently do not outweigh the ▇▇▇▇▇.

More Definitions of Systematic review

Systematic review. We systematically reviewed the existing literature for reports or studies of adverse psychiatric effects, as well as of adverse neurological effects (See Aim 5) of MPH treatment.

Systematic review was carried out, which means we looked at all available studies on this topic. To do this, we used two scientific databases called ‘Web of Science’ and ‘PsychINFO’. At first, we found 849 studies, but once duplicates and studies that were not relevant were screened out, 10 articles were left. We found one more article by checking the lists of the refences in those 10 studies, which left us with a total of 11 articles to look at for our review.