Semitic definition

Semitic with „Jazariyah‟ as a means to correctly denote the relation of the branches to the Arabic stem or „Ur‟language. As such, Acadian, Babylonian, Assyrian, Caldaean and Aramaic tribes in Mesopotamia had its origin in ancient Arabic civilization.59
View Source

Examples of Semitic in a sentence

  • For trichotomic structures, see: Raymond de Hoop, “‘Trichotomy’ in Masoretic Accentuation in Comparison with the Delimitation of Units in the Versions: With Special Attention to the Introduction to Direct Speech,” in Unit Delimitation in Biblical Hebrew and Northwest Semitic Literature, eds.

  • Weak radicals, weak suppletion, and phonological indices in Semitic.

  • This is certainly the case in the nominal system as well in the context of the so-called Semitic Construct State where the head noun on the left merges with the NP to its right (Borer 1989, Benmamoun 2000).

  • Allomorphy in Semitic discontinuous agreement: Evidence for a modular approach to postsyntax.

  • Introduction to the Semitic Languages: Text Specimens and Gram- matical Sketches.

  • This result is also significantly higher than all parsing results reported so far for Arabic, a Semitic lan- guage with similar morphosyntactic phenomena.1 The RR approach is shown to be an adequate way to model complex morphosyntactic patterns for im- proving constituency-based parsing of a morpholog- ically rich, free word order language.

  • Taking Semitic languages as an example, it was shown that an SVM-based shallow parser (Gold- ▇▇▇▇ et al., 2006) does not benefit from includ- ing agreement features for NP chunking in Hebrew.

  • The first one has been deeply studied by scholarship,63 is common in Semitic contexts but can also be found in pagan inscriptions and rituals mostly referred to saviour gods such as Serapis, often merged with Zeus.64 These gods are not supreme because they have emerged and been set apart from the plurality of the divine beings, but precisely because they appear to have unified this plurality in one divine personality.

  • I propose that ϕ-features are organized according to a (context-free) markedness hierarchy: more marked feature cat- egories are represented higher in the ϕ-set in (45).29 I submit that person is a more marked category than number, following the observation from work on the PersonP hypothesis that, in at least Semitic, Romance, and Russian, number agreement is possible without concomitant person agreement, but the opposite is not true.

  • Crucially, subject-indexing morphemes in Semitic look nothing like determiners.