Examples of RVI Policy in a sentence
The Borrower may solicit Competitive Bids by delivery of a Competitive Bid Request substantially in the form of Schedule 2.2(b)-1 to the Agent or each Lender by 11:00 a.m. (San Francisco, California time) on the second Business Day prior to the date of the requested Competitive Loan borrowing.
If no Event of Default exists, the excess portion of the Net Award, with the prior written consent of the insured under the RVI Policy, shall be remitted to the Borrower.
Indeed, the RVI Policy is insurance that protects the lender, not the borrower, as it explicitly states.
In Count II, plaintiffs raised breach of contract claims, alleging that FSL breached the RVI Policies by failing to obtain appraisals of the properties as required under Article IV of the RVI Policy.
Plainly stated, plaintiff had no rights at all under the RVI Policy.
Moreover, the IC Agreement clearly stated that if a claim was, in fact, paid by FSL under the RVI Policy, the property was to immediately be transferred to FSL for no additional consideration.
Further, the IC Agreements were not void as a clog on the equity of redemption because the ICA Acquisition defendants’ rights under those agreements do not arise through foreclosure; rather, their rights arise by FSL’s payment of a claim under the RVI Policy, not plaintiffs’ default under the mortgage.
The fact that FSL paid the Insured Value to plaintiffs’ lenders after they filed a claim under the RVI Policy did not “retire” any of the loan documents or plaintiffs’ obligations under those loan documents—as plainly stated in the RVI Policy.4 And any such argument to the contrary is absurd, defendants argued, considering that plaintiff RA2 Troy paid a premium of $74,418 for the RVI Policy and RA2 Battle Creek paid a premium of $40,670 for the RVI Policy.
Neither the Lessee nor the Lessee Guarantor will take any action (or fail to take any action required of it) that would cause, directly or indirectly, the RVI Policy to cease to be in full force and effect.
Accordingly, plaintiffs argued that they were entitled to summary disposition, not defendants.Defendants filed reply briefs in support of their motions for summary disposition, arguing that the payment of the claim to plaintiffs’ lender pursuant to the RVI Policy did not discharge plaintiffs’ obligations under the loan documents.