Relevancy definition

Relevancy means having some reasonable connection to and having some value or tendency to prove or disprove a matter of factual significance. Questions and evidence about the Complainant’s sexual predisposition or prior sexual behavior are not relevant, unless offered to prove that someone other than the Respondent committed the conduct alleged by the Complainant, or if the questions and evidence concern specific incidents of the Complainant’s prior sexual behavior with respect to the Respondent and are offered to prove consent.

Split View

AI-Powered Contracts

Draft, Review & Redline at the Speed of AI

Get StartedSchedule a Demo

Relevancy means a threshold standard used under this Policy to determine which evidence and questions make a fact more or less likely to be true, and the fact is of consequence in determining the action. Only relevant evidence will be used to adjudicate allegation of Title IX Sexual Harassment and only relevant questions will be permitted on cross- examination. Relevant evidence and relevant questions do not include the following types of evidence and questions:

Relevancy means that the students can incorporate their academic experience within a related direct personal experience in their lives. Teachers and professors, who teach how to learn, think, and apply research

Examples of Relevancy in a sentence

• Criteria should be measureable and time bound.) Sample: Contractor’s performance will be measured on criteria such as: Professionalism with College Personnel and Students Prompt Arrival Ability to Engage Participants Relevancy of Subject Matter Knowledge of Subject Matter Communication Skills Quality of Audio Distribution (for Contractors using a PA system) Ability to Meet Specified Deadline Describe how the Contractor’s performance will be monitored and reported.

• Relevancy, if in question, shall be determined by the Chief Nurse Executive (CNE) and the Professional Nursing Care Committee (PNCC).

• Past Performance Relevancy Ratings: More relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

• Relevancy of the professional and other experience of the faculty member.

• Relevancy of the academic expertise/knowledge of the faculty member.

• Relevancy As it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the source solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance.

• Second, the Government will evaluate the relevancy of all projects/contracts submitted by the offeror and other information available (Relevancy Assessment).

• Relevancy will be determined based on contract references reflecting recent (within the past five years) past performance.

• Upon completion of development and testing activities for Relevancy Rules Bayer will complete data validation and demonstrate (the “Acceptance Test”) that the Licensed Software is capturing License source data, generating results data, and passing results to target applications for reporting purposes (the “Acceptance Criteria”).

• Teaching and Instruction now includes Instructional Performance/Student Success well as Material Preparation and Relevancy and Record Keeping and Instructional Management.

More Definitions of Relevancy

Relevancy meaning of? : Relevancy means connection or link between the fact discovered and the crime. Under Sections 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, it is not the discovery of every fact that is admissible but the discovery of the relevant fact is alone admissible. Relevancy is nothing but the connection or the link between the facts discovered with the crime. In this case u/s 394, 302, 386, 366, 368 IPC read with Section 27 of the Evidence Act, recovery of the motor cycle was sought to be relied upon as a circusmstance against the convicts/appellants but there was nothing on record to show that the motor cycle recovered at the instance of the appellant no. 1 belonged to him. The investigating officer who was cross-examined before the court as P.W. had admitted that he did not know whether the appellant no. 1 was the owner of the motor cycle. He had further admitted that no attempts were made by him to enquire about the owner of the vehicle. His testimony as to the recovery of the motor cycle from the possession of the convict appellant no. 1 was disbelieved by the Supreme Court for the said reason. See: Digamber Vaishnav Vs. State of Chhatishgarh, AIR 2019 SC 1367 (Three-Judge Bench).