Examples of Ratio Test in a sentence
Mortar Aggregate Ratio Test (Proportion Specification): For each mix provided, according to ASTM C 780.
NO If both (1) and (2) are “YES” then see next test below NO If the 3 Month Average Delinquency and Cumulative Net Loss Ratio tests are met, then spread account reduces to 2.00% at April 2016 and/or 1.75% at October 2016 and/or 1.50% at April 2017 and/or 1.15% at October 2017 NO DEFINITIONS: Average Delinquency Ratio Test* On any payment date will be the average of the Delinquency Ratios for the preceding three calendar months.
YES If both (1) and (2) are “YES” then see next test below YES If the 3 Month Average Delinquency and Cumulative Net Loss Ratio tests are met, then spread account reduces to 2.00% at August 2015 and/or 1.75% at February 2016 and/or 1.50% at August 2016 and/or 1.15% at February 2017 DEFINITIONS: Average Delinquency Ratio Test* On any payment date will be the average of the Delinquency Ratios for the preceding three calendar months.
NO If both (1) and (2) are “YES” then see next test below NO If the 3 Month Average Delinquency and Cumulative Net Loss Ratio tests are met, then spread account reduces to 2.00% at September 2018 and/or 1.75% at March 2019 and/or 1.50% at September 2019 and/or 1.15% at March 2020 NO DEFINITIONS: Average Delinquency Ratio Test* On any payment date will be the average of the Delinquency Ratios for the preceding three calendar months.
NO If both (1) and (2) are “YES” then see next test below NO If the 3 Month Average Delinquency and Cumulative Net Loss Ratio tests are met, then spread account reduces to 2.00% at August 2016 and/or 1.75% at February 2017 and/or 1.50% at August 2017 and/or 1.15% at February 2018 NO DEFINITIONS: Average Delinquency Ratio Test* On any payment date will be the average of the Delinquency Ratios for the preceding three calendar months.
NO If both (1) and (2) are “YES” then see next test below NO If the 3 Month Average Delinquency and Cumulative Net Loss Ratio tests are met, then spread account reduces to 2.00% at March 2018 and/or 1.75% at September 2018 and/or 1.50% at March 2019 and/or 1.15% at September 2019 NO DEFINITIONS: Average Delinquency Ratio Test* On any payment date will be the average of the Delinquency Ratios for the preceding three calendar months.
YES If both (1) and (2) are “YES” then see next test below YES If the 3 Month Average Delinquency and Cumulative Net Loss Ratio tests are met, then spread account reduces to 2.00% at August 2014 and/or 1.75% at February 2015 and/or 1.50% at August 2015 and/or 1.15% at February 2016 YES DEFINITIONS: Average Delinquency Ratio Test* On any payment date will be the average of the Delinquency Ratios for the preceding three calendar months.
NO If both (1) and (2) are “YES” then see next test below NO If the 3 Month Average Delinquency and Cumulative Net Loss Ratio tests are met, then spread account reduces to 2.00% at May 2015 and/or 1.75% at November 2015 and/or 1.50% at May 2016 and/or 1.15% at November 2016 DEFINITIONS: Average Delinquency Ratio Test* On any payment date will be the average of the Delinquency Ratios for the preceding three calendar months.
NO If both (1) and (2) are “YES” then see next test below NO If the 3 Month Average Delinquency and Cumulative Net Loss Ratio tests are met, then spread account reduces to 2.00% at August 2017 and/or 1.75% at February 2018 and/or 1.50% at August 2018 and/or 1.15% at February 2019 NO DEFINITIONS: Average Delinquency Ratio Test* On any payment date will be the average of the Delinquency Ratios for the preceding three calendar months.
The basic Lemma of Hirschfeldt (which can be found in [16]) is:Lemma 5.1. If h is a computable order and Γ is an ibT-functional, then the set of strings τ ∈ 2<ω such that for all η ∈ 2|τ|, if Γη = τ, then K(η) < h(|η|), is dense.Iterating Lemma 5.1 over all computable orders (since there is a 0′-listing of those) and ibT-functionals, Hirschfeldt gets a real below 0′ which is not cl-reducible to a complex real.