Questionable definition

Questionable means one who has a previous history of physical or mental health problems.

Questionable information means applicant statements which are inconsistent with other information (such as, previous applications or other case data).

Questionable means inconsistent or contradictory information, statements, documents, or case documentation that requires verification from the household to determine eligibility.

Examples of Questionable in a sentence

• A first day or daily fee of R12 000,00 would then be appropriate.[21] It is significant to note that although counsel’s daily rates are invariably taken as ten times their hourly rates Owen Rodgers (now Rodgers J) in “High Fees and Questionable Practices” published in the Advocate of April 2012 page 40 at page 41 to 42 argues persuasively for a shift to a system where day rates are no more than 8 times counsel’s usual hourly rate.

• Questionable was whether the government should honor the layman parliamentarian’s feelings of pity or the expert’s policy according to which the animals had to survive by themselves.

• Questionable is whether not only the criteria used are sufficiently accurate but also criteria that have not been considered at all might play a role.

More Definitions of Questionable

Questionable. –This means the student-athlete will have to be tested before he/she can resume practice. In some cases an student-athlete will be under this listing because the athletic trainers have not had any communication with him/her on that particular day.

Questionable means the information provided is unclear or conflicting or the county has reason to believe the facts presented are contrary to the information provided by the client.

Questionable which means that the results of the screening process were such that a rescreening is needed within a specified time.

Questionable evaluation in Table 3.3 means that it is unclear whether the respondents have understood the question (Kano et al., 1984). The other five evaluations represent the five essential categories of service quality attributes in the Kano model. Usually, statistical analysis such as the t-test is used to make an overall classification of the quality attributes for all respondents (Witell & Löfgren, 2007 ). In addition to the above mentioned five-level Kano questionnaire, there are also new approaches for classifying service quality attributes based on Kano’s theory, such as the three-level Kano questionnaire (Kano, 2001) and classification through direct questions (Emery & Tian, 2002). However, there is a lack of empirical evidence that these new approaches deliver correct results; thus, the original five-level Kano questionnaire has been the most valid, the most reliable and the most commonly used tool for service quality attribute classification purposes (Mikulic & Prebežac, 2011; Witell & Löfgren, 20 07).