Quarterly Reporting Timeframes Sample Clauses

Quarterly Reporting Timeframes. Quarterly reporting timeframes coincide with the State Fiscal Year as follows: Quarter 1 - (July-September) – Due by October 10 Quarter 2 - (October-December) – Due by January 10 Quarter 3 - (January-March) – Due by April 10 Quarter 4 - (April-June) – Due by July 10
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quarterly Reporting Timeframes. Quarterly reporting timeframes coincide with the State Fiscal Year as follows: Quarter 1 - (July-September) – Due by October 31 Quarter 2 - (October-December) – Due by January 31 Quarter 3 - (January-March) – Due by April 30 Quarter 4 - (April-June) – Due by July 31 THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. Exhibit B Pricing Sheet <Awarded Contractor’s submitted price sheet will be inserted here> Exhibit C Work Plan & IV&V Methodology <Awarded Contractor’s Work Plan & IV&V Methodology will be inserted here> Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit D Contractor Performance Survey Customers shall complete this Contractor Performance Survey for each Contractor on a Quarterly basis. Customers will submit the completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) by email to the Department Contract Manager no later than the due date indicated in Section 1.39 of Contract Number 80101507-SA-15-1. Contractor's Name: Quarter: Purchase Order Number: PO Total $ Amount: PO Starting Date Ending Date Please review the attached Rating Definitions and provide your opinion by rating the following: Quality of Service 1. Effectiveness performing tasks 4  3  2  1  Cost Control
Quarterly Reporting Timeframes. Quarterly reporting timeframes coincide with the State Fiscal Year as follows: Quarter 1 - (July-September) – Due by October 31 Quarter 2 - (October-December) – Due by January 31 Quarter 3 - (January-March) – Due by April 30 Quarter 4 - (April-June) – Due by July 31 Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit B Pricing Sheet Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit C Work Plan & IV&V Methodology The following five pages are the Work Plan & IV&V Methodology for Xxxxxx Information Services, Inc. Xxxxxx’x History of IV&V Project Success Using over 30 years of experience supporting local, state, and federal agencies, Xxxxxx provides IV&V services using proven, strategic methodologies to ensure project success and the highest levels of client satisfaction. Our approach offers an independent assessment and evaluation of large scale software and management/oversight projects. Our expert team works with each client to identify project goals, business processes and requirements and outcomes, and validates the effectiveness of programs and offers recommendation based on proven industry practices and standards. When you choose Xxxxxx, you are choosing an organization that will leverage strong partnerships with industry leading senior consultants and on-staff personnel with decades of proven IV&V experience across Florida’s agencies. Our dedicated, in-house recruiting and client success teams work to ensure we offer each client the best consultants and resources to meet project needs and offer an independent approach to ensuring project success. We work to ensure our consultants knowledge and expertise meet IV&V scope requirements, are available for the project services and duration as outlined by each customer, and have the technical breadth to support IV&V efforts. IV&V Approaches & Methodologies Using over three decades of success in designing and implementing large scale technology projects, IV&V services, and other management support solutions, Xxxxxx will offer each client under the state term contract unparalleled IV&V support to:  Provide an independent review of agency technology and business projects, outcomes, and successes.  Offer recommendations, strategies, and support to improve processes, streamline operations, and ensure technology projects are meeting business requirements.  Verify work quality standards and deliverables meet clie...
Quarterly Reporting Timeframes. Quarterly reporting timeframes coincide with the State Fiscal Year as follows: Quarter 1 - (July-September) – Due by October 31 Quarter 2 - (October-December) – Due by January 31 Quarter 3 - (January-March) – Due by April 30 Quarter 4 - (April-June) – Due by July 31 Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit B Pricing Sheet PRICE Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit C Work Plan & IV&V Methodology
Quarterly Reporting Timeframes. Quarterly reporting timeframes coincide with the State Fiscal Year as follows: Quarter 1 - (July-September) – Due by October 31 Quarter 2 - (October-December) – Due by January 31 Quarter 3 - (January-March) – Due by April 30 Quarter 4 - (April-June) – Due by July 31 Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit B Pricing Sheet Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit C Work Plan & IV&V Methodology The following five pages are the Work Plan & IV&V Methodology for Information Systems of Florida, Inc. PART THREE – WORK PLAN AND IV&V METHODOLOGY Page 1 ISF has completed numerous IV&V projects that leverage our experience in procurement, implementation, and vendor oversight. The ISF team is able to provide unbiased, objective consulting services for our clientssenior managers to protect client interests and assess if any given technology project is compliant with procurement, contractual, project management, schedule, budget, and deliverable expectations. Our team-based and transparent approach allows our clients to fully understand the status of their project, the likelihood of project success, and the small incremental steps that must be taken to keep the initiative on track. ISF’s experienced team ensures the state benefits from best practices and lessons learned from all of our own project engagements. At ISF, we conduct inspections and audits on all our projects to ensure they are completed on time, on budget, and according to client requirements. Our internal auditors conduct IV&V activities on each ISF project regularly and consistently. ISF has over 36 years of experience utilizing best practices and industry standards to assess our projects internally and for our clients, the including Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Standards for IV&V services, Project Management Institute (PMI), and Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI). It is our philosophy that we apply ISF’s proven strategies and years of experience to all of our projects. In doing so, our clients’ IV&V projects receive a higher degree of quality than from a traditional consulting firm that does not conduct these activities as a core business practice. IV&V METHODOLOGY OVERVIEW Design and implementation of large-scale information technology systems are inherently complex. This complexity, combined with the varying needs of the many stakeholders, expo...
Quarterly Reporting Timeframes. Quarterly reporting timeframes coincide with the State Fiscal Year as follows: Quarter 1 - (July-September) – Due by October 31 Quarter 2 - (October-December) – Due by January 31 Quarter 3 - (January-March) – Due by April 30 Quarter 4 - (April-June) – Due by July 31 Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit B Pricing Sheet Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit C Work Plan & IV&V Methodology The following five pages are the Work Plan & IV&V Methodology for Tech Valley Talent, LLC. State of Florida Department of Management Services RFP#05-80101507-IVV-B IT Independent Verification and Validation WORK PLAN AND IV&V METHODOLOGY The primary focus of the Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) Contractor is to work with the client to ensure that the products developed and processes employed by a Project meet specified requirements, employs best practices, adheres to industry and state standards, and is being managed and controlled according to the approved and baselined project plans. In addition, IV&V will facilitate early detection and correction of errors, enhance management insight into risks, provide finding and recommendations and ensure compliance with project scope, schedule, and budget requirements. Essentially the IV&V vendor “Provides a status on the health of the project on a periodic basis”. The success of IV&V engagements for State of Florida projects is increased by the IV&V team’s ability to successfully manage the IV&V engagement. To that end, we incorporate into our own projects the same principles of project management that we expect to find on the projects for which we perform IV&V services. This includes, coordinating the work of a multi-disciplinary team, collaborating with the prime contractor if any, sub-contractors, functional or business clients and Information Technology Services. The principles that will guide the IV&V team are:  To maintain independence and integrity  Have a “No Surprise” policy, where issues are discussed prior to appearing officially in the IV&V report  To work with the vendor teams, business owners and Information technology staff  To work in making the project successful  To give advice/recommendation, not direction  To be cognizant of staff time, and engage them only when required  That all our risks, and recommendations are supported by findings Our proposed approach to IV&V ...
Quarterly Reporting Timeframes. Quarterly reporting timeframes coincide with the State Fiscal Year as follows: Quarter 1 - (July-September) – Due by October 31 Quarter 2 - (October-December) – Due by January 31 Quarter 3 - (January-March) – Due by April 30 Quarter 4 - (April-June) – Due by July 31 Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit B Pricing Sheet Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit C Work Plan & IV&V Methodology The following five pages are the Work Plan & IV&V Methodology for International Consulting Acquisition Corporation dba ISG Public Sector. Florida Department of Management Services RFP No. 05-80101507-IVV-B Part Three – Work Plan and IV&V Methodology October 7, 2015 Work Plan and IV&V Methodology ISG Public Sector has been helping public sector organizations acquire and implement (from a project oversight and organizational change management perspective) new, enterprise-wide systems for the past 18 years. While 18 years of history may not seem extensive, the individuals on our staff average 19 years of public sector and/or system implementation experience. During this 18-year time frame, every client we have worked with has achieved success. Following are the state governments we have assisted:  Alaska  Idaho  Michigan  Nevada  Washington  Arizona  Kansas  Minnesota  Tennessee  West Virginia  Arkansas  Kentucky  Mississippi  Texas  Wisconsin  Florida  Louisiana  Nebraska  Virginia Independence is one of the distinguishing characteristics of our firm in comparison to other project management and quality assurance vendors. We have no formal or informal alliances or affiliations with any software or implementation vendors, and we have never received compensation from any of them. We are truly independent in fact and appearance. Our Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) approach is based upon the best practices we have used in managing numerous, largescale systems projects for our state and local government and higher education clients. Our approach goes beyond software development activities that are the focus of IV&V standards such as the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standard 1012, to include the entire project life cycle. Project Start-Up Requirements RFP Development Development Proposal Evaluation & Negotiation Implementation System Start-Up Design System Construction Deployment Post Go-Live Su...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quarterly Reporting Timeframes. Quarterly reporting timeframes coincide with the State Fiscal Year as follows: Quarter 1 - (July-September) – Due by October 31 Quarter 2 - (October-December) – Due by January 31 Quarter 3 - (January-March) – Due by April 30 Quarter 4 - (April-June) – Due by July 31 Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit B Pricing Sheet Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit C Work Plan & IV&V Methodology The following five pages are the Work Plan & IV&V Methodology for Maximus Human Services, Inc. Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Part Three. Work Plan and IV&V Methodology MAXIMUS Human Services, Inc. (MAXIMUS) brings to the State of Florida a robust and proven Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) methodology. The MAXIMUS Quality Management Methodology (MAX~QMM) — which include IV&V, Quality Assurance (QA), and Project Management — provides a highly-structured, consistent approach that delivers exceptional QA and assessment protocols and outcomes. Our approach is very flexible and will be customized to meet the specific needs of any subsequent Request for Quotes (RFQs) under the new State Term Contract (STC).
Quarterly Reporting Timeframes. Quarterly reporting timeframes coincide with the State Fiscal Year as follows: Quarter 1 - (July-September) – Due by October 31 Quarter 2 - (October-December) – Due by January 31 Quarter 3 - (January-March) – Due by April 30 Quarter 4 - (April-June) – Due by July 31 Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit B Pricing Sheet Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit C Work Plan & IV&V Methodology The following five pages are the Work Plan & IV&V Methodology for NTT Data, Inc. State of Florida | Department of Management Services Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation RFP Number: 05-80101507-IVV-B PART THREE: Work Plan and IV&V Methodology (RFP §5.3.3)
Quarterly Reporting Timeframes. Quarterly reporting timeframes coincide with the State Fiscal Year as follows: Quarter 1 - (July-September) – Due by October 31 Quarter 2 - (October-December) – Due by January 31 Quarter 3 - (January-March) – Due by April 30 Quarter 4 - (April-June) – Due by July 31 Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit B Pricing Sheet Information Technology Independent Verification and Validation Contract No. 80101507-IVV-15-1 Exhibit C Work Plan & IV&V Methodology The following five pages are the Work Plan & IV&V Methodology for Public Consulting Group, Inc. Public Consulting Group, Inc. 7 October 2015 FL DMS 1 PCG IV&V WORK PLAN AND METHODOLOGY Public Consulting Group (PCG) is one of the leading Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) companies in the country with over 17 years of experience in performing true independent and well- executed IV&V programs. Our goal is to collaborate with our clients to implement projects on time, on budget, and to specifications. Our true independence model relies on technical, managerial, financial, and contractual independence and is performed in parallel with developmental efforts with the intent of protecting the customer’s interests. We at PCG view IV&V as a systematic approach to ensure that the product (target system) is being built correctly and that the right application is being built. In order to perform an unbiased audit and objective assessment, the team establishes a relationship with program management and systems development teams in an effort to improve the quality of software and its development process without compromising the organizational independence. While the IT industry is still relatively young, there is a wealth of information available to help ensure the success of any IT project. Collaborating with an experienced independent entity (such as PCG) is often valued as a cost effective method to deliver a successful project by proactively identifying risks and issues. Having resources who are active members in various organizations that develop and maintain Information Technology standards and best practices, PCG endorses their use whenever practical. This active involvement, along with the understanding and experience that PCG consultants possess, contribute significantly to the delivery of a quality product and overall project success.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.