Proposition 200 definition
Examples of Proposition 200 in a sentence
Although Arizona election officials are aware that naturalized citizens who register to vote are likely to have vestigial “For- ▇▇▇▇▇▇” flags in their driver’s license records, election officials still automatically reject and request a new voter registration application from all registrants 11 Under Proposition 200, Arizona requested on its voter registration form that applicants provide their “number of the certificate of naturalization.” JA 174-75 (A.R.S. §16-166(F)).
The fact that tens of thousands of Arizona registrants were rejected after the law went into effect demonstrates that many registrants’ driver’s licenses (or other identifying numbers) alone do not satisfy Proposition 200 requirements.
The Tobacco component of the HPHC IGA is funded by Proposition 200, which states that tobacco tax dollars under the Health Education Account (HEA) requires monies be spent on “programs for the prevention and reduction of tobacco use.” Arizona Revised Statute (A.R.S. § 36-772) authorizes four types of expenditures by the HEA: contracts with county health departments and other local partners, administrative expenses, advertising, and evaluation of programs.
In contrast to the Federal Form, see supra at A.2, Arizona’s registration form includes instructions on the Proposition 200 requirements but no changes registration programs.” 42 U.S.C. §1973gg-4(b).
Voters already on the rolls are “grandfathered in” and do not have to provide Proposition 200 documentation unless they move to a different county in Arizona and 5 In Calik ▇.
Since implement- ing Proposition 200, Arizona has rejected UOCAVA forms from military and overseas applicants when they are not accompanied by the documentation required by Proposition 200.
First, Proposition 200 thwarts Congress’s purpose in enacting the Federal Form provision by requiring county recorders to “reject” valid Federal Forms for failure to meet state requirements.
The Ninth Circuit examined the NVRA and Proposition 200 and concluded that the two statutes addressed the same subject – voter registration by mail for federal elections – and that they were in conflict.
However, because under Proposition 200 county recorders reject every Federal Form that does not also satisfy the additional documentation requirements, the Ninth Circuit concluded that “under a natural reading of the NVRA, Arizona’s rejection of every Federal Form submitted without proof of citizenship does not constitute ‘accepting and using’ the Federal Form.” Pet.
The in- evitable conclusion of this conflict is clear-cut and well-established: Proposition 200 is void to the extent that it requires election officials to reject valid ▇▇▇▇▇- al Forms that the NVRA requires to be accepted.