Examples of Private Plaintiffs in a sentence
The United States shall confer with Private Plaintiffs in the review, comment, and approval process.
Private Plaintiffs have demonstrated they sincerely believe such procedures would harm their patients and force their employees to “engage in material cooperation with evil.” Priv.
The government has failed to demonstrate how exempting Private Plaintiffs pursuant to their religious beliefs would frustrate the goal of ensuring “nondiscriminatory access to health care and health coverage,” and the government has numerous less restrictive means available to provide access and coverage for transition and abortion procedures.
On December 3, 1999, the Private Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint, which added HBE-Florida Corporation (hereinafter "HBE-Florida") as a defendant.
Private Plaintiffs also perform certain procedures for a miscarriage (such as dilation and curettage) and they fear the Rule will require them to perform those procedures for abortions to avoid discrimination on the basis of “termination of pregnancy.” Am. Compl.
Before reaching this question however, the Court is obligated to determine whether it has authority to hear the matter.For the following reasons, the Court concludes that jurisdiction is proper, the regulation violates the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) by contradicting existing law and exceeding statutory authority, and the regulation likely violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”) as applied to Private Plaintiffs.
The Department, after reviewing the draft Accessible Housing Unit Plan, and after consulting with the City, the Private Plaintiffs, and/or the NAC as the Department deems appropriate, will decide whether to approve the Accessible Housing Unit Plan or return the Plan to the City for further action.
Private Plaintiffs allege the Rule violates RFRA because it substantially burdens their exercise of religion.
While this lawsuit involves many issues of great importance—state sovereignty, expanded healthcare coverage, anti-discrimination protections, and medical judgment—ultimately, the question before the Court is whether Defendants exceeded their authority under the ACA in the challenged regulations’ interpretation of sex discrimination and whether the regulation violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act as applied to Private Plaintiffs.
Private Plaintiffs provide a variety of services specifically and exclusively for women (e.g., obstetrics and gynecology; hysterectomies; hormone treatments; reconstructive surgery) that the Rule requires they “demonstrate an exceedingly persuasive justification” to maintain.