Open-ended definition
Open-ended means, with respect to any partnership, limited liability company or other entity or investment vehicle, that such entity or investment vehicle (a) is engaged, or intends to engage, in a continuous offering of its shares or other equity interests on a periodic basis for at least the initial five (5) years of its existence and (b) permits holders of its shares or other equity interests to redeem such shares or interests or otherwise obtain liquidity with respect to such shares or interests on a periodic or scheduled basis.
Open-ended means a collective investment scheme that will continue growing in size as long as there is new demand for its units, being a collective investment scheme that can issue and redeem Shares at any time;
Open-ended means that Shares of the SICAV are redeemable at the request of the relevant Shareholders (see Section "18. Redemption of Shares" below).
More Definitions of Open-ended
Open-ended which means that borrowers may use the devices for as long as they need them to live more independently. The program is available to residents of Massachusetts with a disability and family members who are applying on behalf of their relative with a disability.
Open-ended means any State can come, and includes the participation of Indigenous Peoples, their organizations and representatives. “Intersessional” means that it meets between sessions of the COPS.
Open-ended means that the group is open to all members of the U.N., who particip- ate on an equal footing with each other. The NGOs, specialized agencies and/or bod- ies of the U.N. as well as intergovernmental organizations may attend as observers.
Open-ended means a line of questioning that collects input through a text box rather than a pre-programed set of responses.
Open-ended. : means a RAIF or any one of its Sub-Funds, subject
Open-ended means that Shares of the RAIF are redeemable at the request of the relevant Shareholders;
Open-ended means that in response to questions, respondents volun- teered their answers; interviewers did not require respondents to conform their responses to preconceived fixed categories. Interviewers did, however, press respondents to clarify their comments, whenever possible. Each response was coded by numbers that summarized the content of the response. In most cases, a single response was coded by more than one number. Another coder double checked the mapping. This process allowed Kerwin and Langbein to count the number of respondents who made similar remarks about each rule. Allowing