Examples of NAFCO in a sentence
But Mr. Parrish conceded that, when NAFCO later signed the Contract, the Contract was with Bedeschi—not Dearborn.
And to date, Bedeschi has not provided to NAFCO all of the equipment necessary for NAFCO to assemble the goods.After Bedeschi directed NAFCO to resume shipments in May 2016, Bedeschi told NAFCO to assemble the goods “to the extent possible.” Doc.
When asked about NAFCO’s lost business opportunities, NAFCO President John Parrish testified that he could not remember them “off the cuff” but that NAFCO bids on “a tremendous amount of projects weekly.” Doc.
The next misrepresentation that Mr. Parrish identified was that Bedeschi, Mr. Harp, or Mr. Jones misrepresented that Bedeschi could provide shipping to NAFCO for the project, butBedeschi never adequately fulfilled that obligation.
In response to a question asking him to identify every way that defendants misrepresented something to NAFCO, Mr. Parrish testified that defendants misrepresented who NAFCO actually was working for—either Bedeschi or Dearborn.
Mr. Parrish believes that these actions were fraudulent because, if Bedeschi truly was trying to work with NAFCO, Bedeschi would have told NAFCO what was “going on” but it never did.
NAFCO thus asks the court to enter summary judgment in its favor on this issue.Section 5 of the Subcontract Purchase Order Terms and Conditions permitted Bedeschi to change the scope of work, and it required NAFCO to make the changes promptly.
Also, Mr. Parrish testified that Mr. Harp and Mr. Jones represented to NAFCO “that they would pay us, if not anything, when they got paid, whether we agreed with it.” Doc.
But NAFCO never received such a change order.When asked to identify what alleged misrepresentation Mr. Harp and Mr. Jones failed to correct when they later learned that those representations were false, Mr. Parrish testified that they never corrected the schedule issues when they knew they were not going to meet them.Also, Mr. Parrish testified that Mr. Harp and Mr. Jones never corrected the drawing issues— meaning that the drawings were not correct.
Mr. Jones explained that Bedeschi’s request to assemble the goods “to the extent possible” meant that NAFCO did not have all the components required for full assembly but that Bedeschi was directing NAFCO to assemble the goods to the extent possible with the components that NAFCO did have.