Motion to Compel definition

Motion to Compel means the Motion for Entry of an Order Compelling (a) Debtors’ Payment of Expense Reimbursement Amount and (b) Return of Escrowed Funds [Dkt. No. 346].

Motion to Compel means and refers to the motion entitled “Motion Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 105 and 1142(a) to Compel the Reorganized Debtors to Comply With Their Obligations Under the Second Amended and Restated Joint Plan of Reorganization Dated December 18, 2020” filed at Docket No. 2045 in the Reorganized Debtors’ jointly administered chapter 11 cases.

Motion to Compel means the Motion for Entry of an Order Compelling (a)

Examples of Motion to Compel in a sentence

• In the Third Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs acknowledge the facts outlined in Wells Fargo’s Motion to Compel.

• Referring to the Bermuda action during his motion to compel discovery, the Trustee argued that “[i]n this proceeding, the Trustee seeks to recover the same moneys from the same parties.” (Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of the Trustee’s Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce Documents and Participate in Discovery, dated May 31, 2016, at 7 (ECF Adv.

• Montgomery County Board of Assessment Appeals - Motion to Compel Discovery (Seq.

• The mere filing of a Discovery Motion, Motion to Compel or Motion for Protective Order is insufficient.

• Nothing precludes the use of current Motion to Compel practices as otherwise authorized and permitted.

• Sanctions for failure of compliance or violations of orders on Motion to Compel shall be pursuant to Trial Rule 37.

• DISCOVERY DISPUTES A party may not file a Motion to Compel discovery unless: (1) lead counsel have met and conferred in good faith to try to resolve the dispute, and (2) the party has contacted the Court’s law clerk (with opposing counsel) to arrange a telephone conference with the Court to summarize the dispute and the parties respective positions.

• Defendants propose the timeframe for his files begin in 2010, but due to his position as Head of Diabetes Development, the Court believes the timeframe should begin in 2008.Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel is granted as to the seven individuals Defendants identified and denied as to the ten additional individuals Plaintiffs identified.

• Not only are the requested custodial files limited in their relevance and usefulness, but Plaintiffs’ delay in filing the instant Motion to Compel imposes a greater burden on whatever files Defendants are now required to comb through and produce expediently.

• It appeared that the parties reached an agreement at the hearing consistent with this ruling, but in an effort to avoid further dispute on this point, the Court grants the Motion to Compel as to the 15 non-clinal studies Defendants identified.