Examples of KXX in a sentence
Second order sensitivities are obtained by differentiating once more with respect to X∗.ONote that α is already calculated at (pricing) training time by Cholesky matrix factor- ization of [KX,X + σ2I] with (n3) complexity, so there is no significant computational overhead from Greeking.
However, the Chamber did not find Witness KXX to be credible on matters relating to ₣…ğ HBK.
While a trier of fact is not obliged to detail every step of its reasoning, in view of its concerns regarding the credibility of Witness KXX and its decision to accept his testimony only where corroborated,295 the Trial Chamber was compelled to explain why it relied on the uncorroborated account of Witness KXX instead of Witness YH’s testimony with regard to the time of the Appellant’s arrival at Kaduha Parish.
On the basis of the testimony of Witness KXX, the Trial Chamber found that the Appellant arrived at Kaduha Parish around 9:00 a.m. the same day, discarding the earlier arrival time (around 8:20 a.m.) suggested by Witness YH.326321 Musema Appeal Judgement, para.
The Appellant makes a related submission that the Trial Chamber erred in fact in finding that no evidence was presented to show that Witness KXX had prior knowledge of the Appellant establishing that he was able to accurately identify him during the genocide (Simba Notice of Appeal, II-C-10).281 Simba Appeal Brief, para.
However, mesh-free GPs can be used as described in Section 3.3.×In terms of storage cost, although each kernel matrix KX,X is n n, we only store the n-vector α in (6), which brings reduced memory requirements.
Aloys Simba, Case No. ICTR-01-76-T, Decision on Defence Request for Information Related to Witnesses YH and KXX, 10 November 2004 (“Decision on the Request for Information Related to Witnesses YH and KXX of 10 November 2004”), and to the oral decision of 23 September 2004 (“Simba Oral Decision of 23 September 2004”).
The Appeals Chamber has already addressed these submissions in previous sections of the Appeal Judgement, and has dismissed all but one.460 While it found that the Trial Chamber erred in relying on Witness KXX with regard to the time of the Appellant’s arrival at Kaduha Parish on 21 April 1994,461 this error does not demonstrate any bias in the Trial Chamber’s assessment of the evidence.
As the question whether the Trial Chamber erred in relying on Witness KXX’s testimony is closely linked to alleged contradictions between the respective testimonies of Witnesses YH and KXX, the Appeals Chamber considers that it would be best addressed below in the context of the276 Simba Appeal Brief, paras 131, 160.277 Simba Appeal Brief, paras 131, 157-159.278 Simba Appeal Brief, para.
The Appeals Chamber finally notes that the Appellant fails to submit any argument in support of his contention that the Trial Chamber discounted the testimony of Witness KXX so as to render moot that of HBK.