Joint Exhibit definition

Joint Exhibit means an exhibit that the parties agree should be admitted into evidence.

Examples of Joint Exhibit in a sentence

  • The City notes that Mr. did not refute the police report of the assault upon his wife (Joint Exhibit #3) when cross-examined at the arbitration hearing.

  • The Union recognizes that the Company has the right to subcontract work due to time limitations, cost factors, contractor’s guarantees and warranties, and available people skills, and equipment … (Joint Exhibit 1) The Employer next contends that when the millwrights’ unreasonable refusal to learn to operate the milling machine an “emergency”, as provided in Article 3.03, was created, justifying the outsourcing.

  • When the January 10, 2022 disciplinary hearing was held, the City had obtained no evidence to corroborate the original allegations made against Mr. in October 2021, although the Mayor had received a December 30, 2021 letter from the Grievant’s wife urging that Mr. be returned to work (Joint Exhibit #14).

  • Boylan shall serve as a special master pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, Fed.R.Civ.P. 53 and Local Rule 72.1 to enforce and interpret the settlement agreement entered on February 9, 2011, Joint Exhibit A thereto, the long-form exclusive selling agreement and related matters.

  • First, the Union argues that although the Policy may define the Grievant as a “rehire employee” (Joint Exhibit 2, IV (16)), he is also defined as an “employee” under the DATWA (Minn.

  • The AG asserts that these factors are consistent with the SAG NTG framework, which the AG recommends be utilized in these EEPs. The AG says that Exhibit A to its Brief was the basis for the Settlement Stipulation agreed to in the ComEd case, Docket No. 10-0570, Joint Exhibit 1.0. The AG believes that framework should likewise be adopted for Ameren.

  • Additionally, your conduct, if proven, in specific, would violate Department Rules and Regulations… Joint Exhibit #5 It was reasonable for the City to assume that “if proven” an assault on a family member by a firefighter violates Department Rules and amounts to “conduct unbecoming a member.” In this case, however, Mr. was not terminated for proven misconduct.

  • Above settlement request denied.1 (Joint Exhibit 4) Unable to resolve Grievance #7.07 and Grievance #14.07, the parties referred them to the instant arbitration, the Union alleging CBA violation of Article 3.03 and Articles 3.03 and 9.03, respectively.

  • Boylan is hereby designated to serve as a special master for any disputes that arises between the parties regarding enforcement or interpretation of the Parties’ settlement agreement entered on February 9, 2011, Joint Exhibit A thereto, the long-form exclusive selling agreement and related matters.