ICC Statute definition
Examples of ICC Statute in a sentence
OAUILEGIEXPIAFCHPR/PROT(III) · Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (adopted 17 July 1998, entered into force 1 July 2002) 2187 UNTS 3 (hereinafter: ICC Statute) · Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, UNSC Res.
This is seen, most prominently, in relation to the ICC’s use of the Reparation Principles in the construction of victim norms in the ICC Statute.
Whereas the ad hoc tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda did not allow for victims’ participation per se, the ICC Statute includes explicit provision for this to occur.1147 Subsequent to the inclusion of provisions for victims’ participation in the Rome Statute of the ICC in 1998, other international (or internationalized courts) allowed for this possibility.
See, e.g., Article 3 Statute of the ICTY or Article 8 ICC Statute.
Case Studies on Domestic Implementation of the ICC Statute in Selected Africa Countries, 93.
In the second installment, editor ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ notes that, “states tend to stick to the definition of the crimes as contained in the ICC Statute” and that this “seems … to be a response to the states’ inherent concern to avoid the risk of possibly adverse decisions on complementarity by the ICC.” ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, “National Implementation of the ICC Statute (Part II): Foreword,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5(2) (2007), 419-20.
Although the ICC Statute requires the co-operation of the state parties to it, and in some clauses also foresees interaction with international organizations, these provisions are not by themselves binding on the UN.
The overtly negative, or even hostile, position the government of the United States has taken on the issue of the International Criminal Court (ICC) - after playing an active role in the preparatory work lead- ing up to the adoption of the ICC Statute, in particular the Rome Con- ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ in 1998 - is a matter of common knowledge.
Certain systems require all members of the armed forces to report breaches of IHL.341 The exact status of military police can differ amongst States, with varying levels of independence from the military chain as such a deferential approach is inherent in the structure of the ICC Statute, this need not, of course, be applied equally to investigative standards under IHL itself.
With regard to the denial or obstruction of the delivery of humanitarian assistance, certain crimes under international law and as incorporated in the ICC Statute are of particular relevance.