General operations definition

General operations means annual budgetary operations of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the national government, operating grants and subsidies to state governments, non-governmental organizations, and other programs and activities of the national government.

Split View

AI-Powered Contracts

Draft, Review & Redline at the Speed of AI

Get StartedSchedule a Demo

General operations means usual, day-to-day activities that are conducted or required to facilitate the running of the Local Area Network.

General operations means world­ wide Federal agency operations, other than building operations, and includes services; production and industrial activities; operation of aircraft, ships,

Examples of General operations in a sentence

• General operations, tabulation procedures, backups and general maintenance procedures are covered.

• General operations and general maintenance procedures will be covered.

• General operations within UW Systemwide accounts for common information technology systems and services used for the benefit of the UW System as a whole.

• This section provides the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) policy requirements and aviation safety inspector (ASI) guidance associated with the standard Part A (General) operations specifications (OpSpec) paragraphs and their templates available for issuance to each foreign air carrier or foreign person operating under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 129.

• General operations examples include the World Class Instructional Design and Assessment Consortium, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Dairy, and the Pre-School Lab operations at UW-Madison.

• General, operations, commercial, maintenance, inventory, human resources and information, with the assistance of consultants and experts.

More Definitions of General operations

General operations. Many of the grants are for unrestricted general operating support for EB PREC. EB PREC staff time and overhead in the pursuit of our shared charitable purposes are acceptable uses of these funds. · Other projects: As EB PREC develops projects and engages its membership, other projects may emerge that continue to advance the charitable and educational purposes of the Law Center, and the mission of EB PREC, like new acquisitions and construction to create and preserve affordability, advocacy to assist communities in building their own sustainable sources of food, water, housing, energy, jobs, and other aspects of thriving communities. EB PREC is developing and improving its Owner Group process, and will be responsive to the proposals and initiatives brought by its members. EB PREC and the Law Center will meet at least quarterly and reassess what goals and projects will best advance this work. Making direct expenditures to support this work: Rather than pay all funds to EB PREC, EB PREC and the Law Center may together decide that the Law Center should make direct expenditures in furtherance of the work, rather than pay EB PREC all funds. This might include paying the salary and benefits of Law Center employee Noni Session who works to support EB PREC’s development, under the fiscal sponsee, Collective Action and Land Liberation Institute. Changing the use of funds: As a 501(c)(3) bound to serving charitable purposes, the Law Center retains the discretion to change the use of funds to ensure they are used for charitable purposes. If the Law Center anticipates changing the use of funds, it will give EB PREC as much notice as reasonably possible, and both parties will participate in up to 2 conversations or mediations if requested by the other party, with the goal of finding a resolution that adheres as closely as possibly to the original plan described above. The Law Center recognizes that a unilateral decision to change the use of funds could harm the community and undermine EB PREC’s good work, given the substantial effort and planning that has gone into the above work, so far. Thus, any decision to change the use of funds can only be made by the Law Center after notice and attempts to problem-solve, and after determining that there is no less disruptive ways to mitigate potential h▇▇▇▇ to the Law Center and its other fiscal sponsees from legal and financial liability arising from threats to the charitable purpose.