Count Two definition

Count Two. Money laundering conspiracy: This count involves all the defendants and is based on the same evidence as set out in the conspiracy count above, and the taking of various items and U.S. currency in payment for drug debts to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and specific statements of some defendants and others about using drug proceeds to promote further distribution. Specifically, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ would obtain money from his and other co- conspirators distribution of cocaine, marijuana, and crack and then use some or all of those drug-distribution proceeds to purchase further amounts of controlled substances from ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and others for further distribution.

Split View

AI-Powered Contracts

Draft, Review & Redline at the Speed of AI

Get StartedSchedule a Demo

Count Two. An employee has a duty to protect and conserve government property and shall not use such property, or allow its use, for other than authorized purposes. District Personnel Manual (“DPM”) § 1808.1.

Count Two. Aggravated Identity Theft

Examples of Count Two in a sentence

• Defendant will plead guilty because he is in fact guilty of the charge contained in Count Two of the indictment.

• The defendant further understands that upon pleading guilty to Count Two of the indictment charging the defendant with a violation of 18 U.S.C. '' 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) and (h), that is, conspiracy to commit money laundering, the maximum penalty the Court may impose is not more than 20 years of imprisonment, not more than a $500,000.00 fine and not more than three years of supervised release and that this offense is a Class C felony.

• The defendant agrees to and hereby does plead guilty to the lesser included charge in Count One of the Indictment now charging the defendant with a violation of 21 U.S.C. '' 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) and 846, that is, conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing cocaine and 100 kilos or more of a mixture or substance containing marijuana and pleads guilty to Count Two, a violation of 18 U.S.C. '' 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) and (h), that is conspiracy to commit money laundering.

• Defendant will plead guilty because he is in fact guilty of the charges contained in Counts One and Count Two of the indictment.

• Defendant will plead guilty because she is in fact guilty of the charge contained in Count Two of the indictment.

• By this Plea Agreement, defendant agrees to enter a voluntary plea of guilty to the following counts of the indictment: Count One, which charges defendant with attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2332a(a)(2)(D); and Count Two, which charges defendant with attempted use of an explosive device in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 844(i).

• There is a one-level increase for the money laundering conduct charged in Count Two, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2S1.1(b)(2)(A).

• The defendant understands that upon his plea of guilty to Count Two of the Information charging him with health care fraud, the maximum penalty the Court may impose is not more than ten years of imprisonment, a $250,000 fine, three years of supervised release, and a $100 mandatory special assessment per felony count of conviction which must be paid in full at the time of sentencing.

• By this Plea Agreement, defendant agrees to enter a voluntary plea of guilty to the following counts of the information: Count One, which charges defendant with bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 666(a)(1)(B); and Count Two, which charges defendant with filing a false tax return, in violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7206(1).

• Count Two does not group with any other Count pursuant to Guideline § 3D1.1(b)(1).

More Definitions of Count Two

Count Two. On or about November 17, 1993, UDT shipped 98 photosensors to --------- HDOS under purchase order no. 92205, along with a certificate of conformance certifying that the photosensors had been manufactured and quality tested in accordance with applicable military specifications. In truth and in fact, as UDT well knew, this certification was false in that the required 100% optical testing had not been performed. UDT's tester skipped the required tests and knowingly used the RNG program to create false computer test data. UDT's false certification was within the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Defense.

Count Two. Money laundering conspiracy: This count involves all the defendants and is based on the same evidence as set out in the conspiracy count above, and the taking of various items and U.S. currency in payment for drug debts to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and specific statements of some defendants and others about using drug proceeds to promote further distribution. Specifically, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ would obtain money from his and other co-conspirators’ distribution of cocaine, marijuana, and crack and then use some or all of those drug-distribution proceeds to purchase further amounts of controlled substances from ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and others for further distribution. All co-defendants were aware that drug proceeds were being used to promote the conspiracy.