Construct validity definition

Construct validity means that the results of the research model generalize to the theory (Van de Ven, 2007). Threats to the construct validity of the present study could be the mono-method bias, since only interviewing is used to measure the variables.
View Source
Construct validity means the degree to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure. When applied to an educator practice evaluation instrument, construct validity means that the dimensions and categories described by the instrument are appropriate for measuring whether or not the practice is successful and that the dimensions are associated with each other in the ways anticipated and possibly related to other generally-accepted measures of professional effectiveness. In addition, the instrument shall sample from a sufficient range of professional actions to fully represent the set of desirable behaviors. The establishment of such claim must be attested by knowledgeable practitioners or experts in the content.]
View Source

Examples of Construct validity in a sentence

  • The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample.

  • Construct validity must be further established by examining associations of the scales with implicit measures that have already been extensively validated, such as for example the SCORS.

  • Construct validity was assessed using the Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation (FIRO-B) measure (▇▇▇▇▇▇, 1977).

  • Construct validity involves identifying a psychological trait (construct) that underlies successful performance on the job and then devising a selection procedure to measure the presence and degree of the construct.

  • Construct validity entails proving validity of an instrument against other instruments that claim to measure the same or similar hypothetical construct23,25,50.

  • Construct validity was considered satisfactory if at least 75% of the associations were in correspondence with predefined hypotheses.

  • Construct validity was assessed by testing predefined hypotheses [14].

  • Construct validity was demonstrated by significant associations between FIRO-B’s need for inclusion and affection scales to NSSQ’s functional subscales (r= .18 to .27) and to most of the NSSQ’s network scales (r= .17 to .23) (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al., 1983).

  • Content validity refers to the comprehensiveness of the items in sampling the domain of interest.33 Construct validity is established by comparing results between different measures that are supposed to measure similar constructs, and the extent these results are consistent with theoretically hypothesised relationships between the measure and the patient group.27;34 When using HRQL as an outcome measure of therapeutic efficacy, it is of clinical interest to determine treatment effects on HRQL over time.

  • Construct validity was assessed using a one- way analysis of variance.