CASE I definition

CASE I. For implementation-type contracts:
View Source
CASE I. C" a carrier issued a ▇▇▇▇ of lading acknowledges receipt a box of goods stating that value, weight, contents and the quality of the goods were unknown. The shipper transferred the ▇▇▇▇ of lading to "P". When the goods were delivered it was found these goods were not the same as described. "P" brought an action against C. Will he succeed? CASES – II: "P" held as endorsee for ▇▇▇▇ of lading for ground nuts shipped from Bombay to London. During the voyage ships deviated and called at a port not lying on the prescribed route. Resumed the prescribed route and collided with another vessel, in consequences a quarter of the ground nuts was lost. The vessel proceeded on her voyage and while nearing London was sunk by an enemy submarine. Can "P" recover his loss from ship owner? Page 487,488,489 (N.D Kapoor) Page 549,550,551 (▇.▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇) Page 260,261,262 (Study Text) Difference of Function: In case of voyage charter, the ship undertakes to transport a specified cargo between designated ports. In other words, the ship- owner provides carrying services to the charterer. In time charter, the ship owner places his vessel for an agreed time at the disposal of the charterer who is free to employ it for his own purposes with in the permitted contractual limits. Difference of Commercial: The voyage charterer in contract takes little more part in the operation of the vessel. His primary obligation is to provide a cargo is to arrange for its reception at the port of discharge. The time charterer controls the commercial function of the vessel and is normally responsible from expenditure directly resulting from compliance with his instruction such as fuel cost, port charges and cost of loading and discharging the cargo. Freight / Hire: Freight is the consideration payable to a carrier for the carriage of the goods from the port of shipment to the agreed destination. The obligation to pay freight can arise either under a voyage charter or a ▇▇▇▇ of lading contract. Here the payments are made in respect of the carriage of goods from one place to another. In time charter, the obligation of the charterer is to pay hire. Hire is payable for his right to use a vessel for a specific period of time irrespective of the extent to which it is employed by the charterer for the carriage of cargo.
View Source

Examples of CASE I in a sentence

  • IN EACH CASE (I) THROUGH (III), WHETHER OR NOT FORESEEABLE; EVEN IF A PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, LOSSES, COSTS OR EXPENSES.

  • IN EACH CASE (I) THROUGH (III), WHETHER OR NOT FORSEEABLE; EVEN IF LIFERAY, ITS AFFILIATES OR A BUSINESS PARTNER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, LOSSES, COSTS OR EXPENSES.

  • CASE I An employee who works from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and is called in at 1:00 a.m. and works until 3:30 a.m., then resumes their regular shift at 8:00 a.m., would be paid overtime for the hours worked from 1:00 a.m. to 3:30 a.m., but would be on straight time for 8:00 a.m.

  • IN EACH CASE (I) THROUGH (III), WHETHER OR NOT FORESEEABLE, EVEN IF A PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, LOSSES, COSTS OR EXPENSES.

  • SLIM-LINE CANS PER CASE FOB COMPANY WAREHOUSE PRICING TO DISTRIBUTOR: $ 12.00 PER CASE I MINIMUM ONE (1) PALLET* 208 CASES I PALLET 20 PALLETS PER TRUCKLOAD I CONTAINER LOAD 4,160 CASES PER TRUCKLOAD I CONTAINER LOAD * Minimum Order per SKU is one (1) pallet I NO "mixed pallets" of all 4 products.

  • IN EACH CASE (I) THROUGH (III), WHETHER OR NOT FORESEEABLE, THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PARTIES AND ITS AFFILIATES WILL BE EXCLUDED, EVEN IF A PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, LOSSES, COSTS OR EXPENSES.

  • IN EACH CASE (I) THROUGH (III), WHETHER OR NOT FORESEEABLE; EVEN IF A PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAG ES, LOSSES, COSTS OR EXPENSES.

  • International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers EXAMPLES SECTION CASE I An employee who works from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and is called in at 1:00 a.m. and works until 3:30 a.m., then resumes his regular shift at 8:00 a.m., would be paid overtime for the hours worked from 1:00 a.m. to 3:30 a.m., but would be on straight time for 8:00 a.m. The employee had a continuous 8 hour break between the end of one regular shift (4:30 p.m. to l:00 a.m.) and the beginning of the next.

  • IN EACH CASE (I) THROUGH (III), WHETHER OR NOT FORESEEABLE; EVEN IF LIFERAY, ITS AFFILIATES OR A BUSINESS PARTNER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, LOSSES, COSTS OR EXPENSES.

  • CASE I - An employee who works from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and is called in at 1:00 a.m. and works until 3:30 a.m., then resumes his regular shift at 8:00 a.m., would be paid overtime for the hours worked from 1:00 a.m. to 3:30 a.m., but would be on straight time for 8:00 a.m. The employee had a continuous 8 hour break between the end of one regular shift (4:30 p.m. to l:00 a.m.) and the beginning of the next.