[A]s a general matter, definition
[A]s a general matter, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content.’” Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union, 535 U.S. 564, 573 (2002) (alteration in original) (quoting Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp., 463 U.S. 60, 65 (1983)). Content-based restrictions on speech are ordinarily subject to strict scrutiny. See Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 576 U.S. 155, 163-64 (2015). A law is content-based if it “applies to particular speech because of the topic discussed or the idea or message expressed.” Id. at 163.
[A]s a general matter, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content.” ’ ” Bey at ¶ 20 quoting Ashcroft v. Am. Civil Liberties Union, 535 U.S. 564, 573, 122 S.Ct. 1700 (2002), quoting Bolger v. Youngs Drug
[A]s a general matter, the First Amendment means that
More Definitions of [A]s a general matter,
[A]s a general matter, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict ex- pression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content.’ ” Ashcroft v. Am. Civil Liberties Union, 535 U.S. 564, 573 (2002) (quoting Bolger v.
[A]s a general matter, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content.’” Ashcroft v. A.C.L.U., 535 U.S. 564, 573 (2002) (alteration in original) (quoting Bolger v. Youngs Drug Prods. Corp., 463 U.S. 60, 65 (1983)). The few categories of speech the Supreme Court has exempted
[A]s a general matter, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content.” ’ ” Ashcroft v. Am. Civil Liberties Union, 535 U.S. 564, 573, 122 S.Ct. 1700, 1521 L.Ed.2d 771 (2002), quoting Bolger v. Youngs
[A]s a general matter, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content.’” Ashcroft v. Am. Civil Liberties Union, 535