Antitrust Litigation definition
Examples of Antitrust Litigation in a sentence
Litigation means the direct and indirect purchaser class proceedings in the United States which pertain to film, aluminum and tantalum electrolytic capacitors which have been consolidated and are proceeding as class actions litigation under the general style of cause, for both direct and indirect purchaser class proceedings, In re: Capacitors Antitrust Litigation, case number 3:14-cv-03264-JD, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Litigation means the class action proceeding pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, under the caption In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation 3:10-md-02143-RS, and includes all actions transferred by the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation for coordination involving similar allegations relating to ODD and ODD Products.
The term “Disputes” means the Patent Litigation, the German Patent Litigation, the Antitrust Litigation, the Patent Actions, and the Other Actions, and any and all disputes related thereto.
A Settlement has been reached between the Plaintiffs in In re Ready-Mixed Concrete Antitrust Litigation, Case No.
For all cases, including but not limited to the Patent Litigation, German Patent Litigation, the Antitrust Litigation and the Other Actions, the Parties agree that each will pay its own costs and attorneys’ fees and that neither will file requests for, or otherwise seek to recover, its costs or fees.
No. 11-CV-02075-RJL (D.D.C.), and (ii) In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation, No. 04-CV-02676-CRB (N.D. ▇▇▇) (including claims that have been asserted to have been alleged in the Second Amended and Third Amended Complaints against Bank of America, N.A.).
Any bills of costs, judgments or other requests previously filed or awarded in such cases that have not yet been paid including without limitation the judgment for costs awarded to Micron in the Antitrust Litigation shall be withdrawn or vacated.
Direct Purchaser Plaintiff(s) are prosecuting the above-captioned In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, Master File No. 2:12-md-02311 (E.D. Mich.) (the “MDL Proceeding”), and Case Nos.
For the avoidance of doubt, this provision (i) requires Rambus to withdraw and discontinue the German Patent Litigation, (ii) requires SK hynix to withdraw and discontinue the Other Actions, and (iii) does not require Rambus to withdraw any complaint or other proceeding as against parties other than SK hynix or its Subsidiaries, including but not limited to the Antitrust Litigation.
The term “Disputes” means the Patent Litigation, the Antitrust Litigation, the Virginia Litigation, the Delaware Litigation and the Patent Actions, and any and all disputes related thereto.