Abolish definition

Abolish means to repeal the statutes creating and empowering an agency, remove its personnel, and transfer its records to the department of administrative services pursuant to division (E) of section 149.331 of the Revised Code.
Abolish means to repeal the statutes creating and 89
Abolish means to repeal the statutes creating and empowering an agency, remove its personnel, and transfer its

Examples of Abolish in a sentence

  • Abolish any position or positions for reasons of economy or because of reduction in the number of pupils or a change in administrative or supervisory organization of the district or for other good cause.

  • Abolish the Department of Education and redirect funds from “No Child Left Behind” to parents who participate in school choice voucher programs/alternative education.

  • Possible options: • Abolish income tax completely and raise taxes from a General Sales Tax (not VAT which is excessively costly to implement ie costly as far as the maintenance of records by taxpayers is concerned).

  • Alphabetical Index by Rule Subject Rule Abolish Positions Notice ....................................................................................................................

  • Facts about death sentences, court reporters, and the national Committee to Abolish the Federal Death Penalty.

  • They cannot maintain their tax status and participate in behaviors like making public statements (such as tweets) that support (or oppose) a candidate or campaign.3 Examples of 501(c)(3)’s include the American Council of the Blind, the Coalition to Abolish Slavery and Trafficking, and 4-H.

  • Change or Abolish Job Classification: The City shall have sole and exclusive authority to establish, decide, determine and designate all occupational classifications it has to offer employees, including the right to establish new classifications, reclassify, change, consolidate or abolish existing classifications at any time, and to determine job content, duties and responsibilities.

  • Section 3.1 Decision to Add or Abolish Positions Where practicable, the Association shall be notified in writing sixty (60) days prior to the date of implementation of any proposed modification to the organizational structure of the District which would result in an addition to, or reduction of, positions represented by the Association, The Association may react to such proposed modifications and present a written response within twenty (20) school days to the District for its consideration.

  • Abolish Nuclear Weapons said the US action shows the principal will soon.


More Definitions of Abolish

Abolish means to "do away with wholly" or "put an end to". It embodies both the legal connotation of "prohibit "and much of the sense of permanence and comprehensiveness of "eliminate". But it is more often (and some would argue more appropriately) applied to laws, customs, and institutions (such as slavery, capital punishment, or war) than to physical objects (such as nuclear weapons). Moreover, thinking about this word's most familiar usage, which is in relation to the abolition of slavery, suggests some ambiguity about whether complete effectiveness is implied: abolition certainly deprived slavery of its legitimacy, one presumes permanently, and disposed of the institution in its most conspicuous form; but still some forms of slavery persist (such as the selling of girls and young women into sexual slavery, which although illegal occurs quite routinely in a number of societies).
Abolish means to tear down, or, in the case of laws or covenants, “to render void, of no further conse- quence.” Yeshua clearly states that He did not come with a purpose to abolish the Law and the Prophets.
Abolish means to repeal the statutes creating and 71
Abolish means "to do away with wholly; to annul; to make void; as to abolish a law or custom, taxes, or folly." (Webster's Collegiate Dictionary) Before I give the $200 text showing WHEN, WHERE, and BY WHOM abolished, let us first notice WHEN, WHERE, and BY WHOM the Sabbath was GIVEN. Study the following texts:
Abolish means to “do away with wholly” or “put an end to”. It embodies both the legal connotation of “prohibit” and much of the sense of permanence and comprehensiveness of “eliminate”. But it is more often (and some would argue more appropriately) applied to laws, customs, and institutions (such as slavery, capital punishment, or war) than to physical objects (such as nuclear weapons). Moreover, thinking about this word’s most familiar usage, which is in relation to the abolition of slavery, suggests some ambiguity about whether complete effectiveness is implied: abolition certainly deprived slavery of its legitimacy, one presumes permanently, and disposed of the institution in its most conspicuous form; but still some forms of slavery persist (such as the selling of girls and young women into sexual slavery, which although illegal occurs quite routinely in a number of societies). “Nuclear disarmament”, finally, is even more ambiguous: it can and often does mean merely reducing or limiting one’s forces, not necessarily reaching zero. The usual approach to reducing this ambiguity is resort to more cumbersome (and nonetheless still ambiguous!) formulations such as “complete nuclear disarmament” or “comprehensive nuclear disarmament”. These considerations figured in the preference expressed in the National Academy of Sciences’ 1997 nuclear weapon study for the word “prohibition” to describe an approach to the NWFW issue that ultimately could be accepted as both desirable and feasible. This choice has the attraction of avoiding both ambiguity and the common objection, made against “elimination” or “abolition”, that these goals are unattainable insofar as (a) there would never be certainty that every last weapon was gone and (b) the knowledge of how to make nuclear weapons — hence the possibility of reconstitution of nuclear arsenals — cannot be eradicated. Prohibition, as a matter of law, is certainly possible in principle; the main argument is about what it would actually accomplish. There is also the question, of course, of exactly what is to be prohibited or eliminated in a NWFW. The candidates include, in order of increasing comprehensiveness and stringency: