Abnormal definition

Abnormal means nontypical or unusual conditions that could cause damage to systems and components of the home.

Abnormal means a result of an analysis performed as part of a newborn screening test that deviates from the range of values established by the Department.

Abnormal means nontypical or unusual conditions that could cause damage to systems and

Examples of Abnormal in a sentence

• Abnormal process operating conditions shall be documented, and analysed to identify any necessary corrective action.

• Abnormal conduct or erratic behavior while at work or a significant deterioration in work performance.

• The Client acknowledges that under Abnormal Market Conditions the period during which the Orders are executed may be extended or it may be impossible for Orders to be executed at declared prices or may not be executed at all.

• Abnormal /bad weather or Serious loss or damage by fire or Civil commotion, strike or lockout (other than among the labour engaged by the contractor) affecting any or the trades employed on the work, or Non availability of departmental stores.

• Any condition or situation that results from lack of sufficient generating capacity to meet load requirements or that results solely from economic conditions shall not, standing alone, constitute an Abnormal Condition.

More Definitions of Abnormal

Abnormal means something unusual, rarely happening: if something is rare enough, it is not typical (“abnormal”). Let us describe what, e.g., an abnormal height may mean. If a person’s height is 6 ft, it is still normal (although it may be considered abnormal in some parts of the world). Now, if instead of 6 pt, we consider 6 ft 1 in, 6 ft 2 in, etc, then sooner or later we will end up with a height h such that everyone who is higher than h will be definitely called a person of abnormal height. We may not be sure what exactly value h experts will call “abnormal”, but we are sure that such a value exists.

Abnormal means the anticipated release of flammable gas, vapor, or vapor liquid within the enclosure when the system that supplies the flammable gas, vapor or vapor liquid is either leaking or is otherwise operating abnormally. The magnitude of this anticipated release is one of the following:

Abnormal is defined as substantially out of line with the normal ratio of profit to turnover. For example, if a 40 per cent. profit is earned by the group in relation to turnover in one continent, compared with 10 per cent. on turnover elsewhere, this fact should be made apparent.

Abnormal defined as greater ten percent (10%) variation in Sanmina's cost of Material(s)] changes are experienced in material costs; or

Abnormal based on the kappa coefficients. Xxxxxxx et al. [5] reported com- parable results. Since the kappa coefficient de- pends on the true prevalence, studies can only be correctly compared if there is agreement of the group divisions [22]. For this reason, we selected group divisions in agreement with those of Roovers et al. [5]. Xxxxxxxxx et al. [15], Xxxxx et al. and Xxxxxxxx et al. [13, 14] described better results for the kappa values but because the divi- sion of groups is not in agreement with ours, no direct comparison can be made. This fact has not always been adequately taken into account in other studies [5]. A poor agreement is clear in the study by Disat et al. [25]. The computation of the hier- archical ANOVA, the intra-class correlation coef- ficient (ICC), the application of the method by Xxxxx-Xxxxxx to obtain the estimates of bias and the limits of agreement together with the estima- tion of the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) by Xxx seem to be appropriate statistical tools to study the agreement between observer groups. Moreover, the inter-observer agreement found in our study is comparable with the results of other studies [5, 13–15].

Abnormal means that the lab results are outside the reference range

Abnormal identity as a means to positively impact the legal discourse and receive her desired outcome. She was „expected to play the deviant role‟ (Barnes et al., 1999:23) which required her stigmatised attribute be openly discussed in court. Performing this identity contributes to people‟s fear of the uncertain consequences of „knowing that in their hearts the others may be defining him in terms of his stigma‟ (Goffman, 2006:136). Thus the interview participants (2011) were uncertain how their deviant category would be used in judicial discourses.