Measures Musterklauseln
Measures. Insofar as third-party rights have been infringed upon, Aiio can choose to rectify this by • attaining usage rights for the CLIENT from the owner of the copyright that has been infringed upon, to the extent required under the terms of this agreement between the CLIENT and Aiio or • adjusting the software causing the copyright infringement without impact on the software, or with impact on the software only insofar as this is reasonable for the CLIENT or • exchanging the software causing the copyright infringement with another software, which does not infringe upon any copyright. The exchange is made without impact on functionality, or with impact on functionality only insofar as this is reasonable for the CLIENT or • delivering of a new software version which if used does not infringe on any third-party copyright.
Measures. Explicit emotion regulation. The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇; ▇▇▇▇ et al., 2011) consists of 36 items and measures nine different strategies of emotion regulation (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al., 2001). Participants rated their responses on a five-point scale (1=“almost never” to 5=“almost always”) regarding how frequently they use the described emotion regulation strategies. The nine strategies can be subdivided into more functional ones (acceptance, positive refocusing, refocus on planning, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective) and dysfunctional ones (self-blame, rumination, catastrophizing, blaming others). The psychometric features of the CERQ were shown to be sufficient. Internal consistencies ranged from Cronbach’s α=.75 to α=.87 and the test–retest correlation ranged from rtt=.48 to rtt=.65 for the original version (Garnefski & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2007). For the German adaption, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'▇ α coefficients were ≥.73, except for the subscales acceptance (α=.60) and rumination (α=.66), and the test–retest correlations ranged between rtt=.48 and rtt=.84 (Loch et al., 2011). Implicit emotion regulation. For the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP; ▇▇▇▇▇ et al., 2005), two stimulus modalities were used: pictures and faces. The pictures (of two valences: neutral and negative) were chosen from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS; ▇▇▇▇ et al., 2008) and the face stimuli (of two valences: neutral and angry) were selected from the Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces (KDEF; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al., 1998). We chose 20 items of each modality, including 10 of each valence. This resulted in two sets of each, pictures and faces, including neutral and negative stimuli – one for each of the two experimental sessions. The pictures used were chosen from sets 1–20. It was statistically checked that the picture stimuli did not differ significantly with regard to valence, arousal, or dominance between the two stimulus subsets (i.e. negative picture stimuli assessed in the luteal phase did not significantly differ from negative stimuli assessed in the follicular phase, etc.). Moreover, we conducted an ANOVA to ensure that neutral and negative stimuli differed with respect to valences. We re-checked this for each applied subset. The facial stimuli were chosen on the basis of empirically validated subsamples of the KDEF (▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2008; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al., 2008; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al., 1998). We selected those facial expressions that were ...