Common Contracts

7 similar Settlement and Release Agreement contracts

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
Settlement and Release Agreement • September 12th, 2022

This Settlement and Release Agreement (“Agreement” or “Settlement Agreement”) is entered into by and between Veriff, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Anthony McGowan; A.M., a Minor, by and through his guardian Anthony McGowan; and Carlos Pena, Jr. (“Plaintiffs” or “Class Representatives”), individually and on behalf of the Settlement Class, in the case McGowan, et al.

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
Settlement and Release Agreement • February 3rd, 2022 • Illinois

This Settlement and Release Agreement (“Agreement” or “Settlement Agreement”) is entered into by and between Luxottica of America Inc. (“Defendant”) and Amanda Vo (“Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of the Settlement Class, in the case Vo v. Luxottica of America Inc., Case No. 2019-CH-10946, currently pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division (the “Litigation”). Defendant and Plaintiff are each referred to herein as a “Party” and are collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
Settlement and Release Agreement • December 17th, 2021 • Illinois

This Settlement and Release Agreement (“Agreement” or “Settlement Agreement”) is entered into by and between UKG, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Tracy Jackson (“Plaintiff”) individually and on behalf of the Settlement Class, in the case of Jackson v. UKG, Inc., f/k/a The Ultimate Software Group, Inc., No. 2020L31, currently pending in the Circuit Court of McLean County, Illinois, and all prior iterations of this case (collectively, the “Litigation”). Defendant and Plaintiff are each referred to herein as a “Party” and are collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
Settlement and Release Agreement • May 31st, 2021 • Illinois

This Settlement and Release Agreement (“Agreement” or “Settlement Agreement”) is entered into by and between TimeClock Plus, LLC (“Defendant”), and Mark Draland (“Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of the Settlement Class, in the case of Draland v. TimeClock Plus, LLC, No. 2019-CH-12769, currently pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division (the “Litigation”). Defendant and Plaintiff are each referred to as a “Party” and are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties.”

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
Settlement and Release Agreement • May 28th, 2021 • Illinois

This Settlement and Release Agreement (“Agreement” or “Settlement Agreement”) is entered into by and between Paychex, Inc. (“Defendant”), and Monique Roberts (“Plaintiff”) individually and on behalf of the Settlement Class, in the case of Roberts v. Paychex, Inc. No. 19- CH-00205, currently pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division (the “Litigation”). Defendant and Plaintiff are each referred to herein as a “Party” and are collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
Settlement and Release Agreement • April 14th, 2021 • Illinois

This Settlement and Release Agreement (“Agreement” or “Settlement Agreement”) is entered into by and between Paramount Staffing, Inc. (collectively with its parents, subsidiaries, and affiliates, “Defendant”), and LaQuanderia Roberts (“Plaintiff”), both individually and on behalf of the Settlement Class, in the case Roberts v. Paramount Staffing, Inc., Case No. 2017- CH-15522, currently pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division (the “Litigation”). Defendant and Plaintiff are each referred to as a “Party” and are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties.”

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
Settlement and Release Agreement • January 7th, 2020 • Illinois

This Settlement and Release Agreement (“Agreement” or “Settlement Agreement”) is entered into by and between Multimedia Sales & Marketing, Inc. (“Defendant”), and Francisco Lopez and Jeffrey Buehler (“Plaintiffs”) both individually and on behalf of the Settlement Class, in the case of Lopez v. Multimedia Marketing & Sales, Inc. No. 2017-CH-15750 (Cir. Ct. of Cook Cty., Illinois), currently pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division (the “Litigation”). Defendant and Plaintiffs are each referred to as a “Party” and are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties.”

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.