Xxxxxxxx Corp. 495 F.2d 448 (2d Cir. 1974), abrogated on other grounds by Xxxxxxxxxx v. Integrated Res., Inc., 209 F.3d 43 (2d Cir. 2000); see also Xxxxxxx v. TJX Companies, Inc., 2016 WL 8677312, n.8 (D. Mass. Sept. 30, 2016) (“[courts in this Circuit frequently employ the Second Circuit’s Xxxxxxxx factors or some version of it.”).
Xxxxxxxx Corp and IRIC, U.S. District Court Southern District of Texas; Civil Action No. 4:07-CV-02796, (ii) Huntsman Corp. and IRIC v. Ace Am. Ins. Co., et al., U.S. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx of Texas, Civil Action No. 4:08-CV-1542, (iii) any insurance proceeds or other monies received by Huntsman through the adjustment process, by settlement or otherwise in connection with the April 29, 2006 Fire, or (iv) the adjustment or payment of insurance proceeds in connection with the April 29, 2006 Fire.
Xxxxxxxx Corp. 495 F.2d 448, 463 (2d Cir. 1974), abrogated on other grounds by Xxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxx Corp. 495 F. 2d 448, 463 (2d Cir. 1974).
Xxxxxxxx Corp. Norcold, Inc., and Xxxxx-Xxxxxxx-Xxxxx Corp., No. SACV13-00081 JLS (RNBx) (C.D. Cal.).
Xxxxxxxx Corp. Norcold, Inc. and Xxxxx-Xxxxxxx-Xxxxx Corp., No. SACV13-00081 JLS (RNBx) (C.D. Cal.) on April 15, 2013.
Xxxxxxxx Corp. By: /s/ Xx Xxxxxxx ------------------------------ Xx Xxxxxxx President THE XXXXX CORPORATION By: /s/ Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx ---------------------------- Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx President SCHEDULE 1
Xxxxxxxx Corp. Adv. Pro. No. 23-01294 (MBK) in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases (the “Adversary Proceeding”) at Docket No. 1.
Xxxxxxxx Corp. (1) the complexity, expense and likely duration of the litigation; (2) the reaction of the class to the settlement; (3) the stage of the proceedings and the amount of discovery completed; (4) the risks of establishing liability; (5) the risks of establishing damages; (6) the risks of maintaining the class action through the trial; (7) the ability of the defendants to withstand a greater judgment; (8) the range of reasonableness of the settlement fund in light of the best possible recovery; [and] (9) the range of reasonableness of the settlement fund to a possible recovery in light of all the attendant risks of litigation. Xxxxxxx x. Xxxxxx, 731 F.3d 241, 247 (2d Cir. 2013) (citing City of Detroit x. Xxxxxxxx Corp., 495 F.2d 448, 463 (2d Cir. 1974) abrogated on other grounds by Xxxxxxxxxx v. Integrated Res., Inc., 209 F.3d 43 (2d Cir. 2000); other citation omitted).
Xxxxxxxx Corp. CVH20180055 (Madison Cty. Common Pleas Ct.), as to these three Settling Distributors.
