Work Allocation Review Process Clause Samples

Work Allocation Review Process. Where an employee believes that the work allocation relating to his/her role is unreasonable, the following process should be applied to seek to resolve such concerns. 14.5.1 In the first instance, an employee(s) should raise any concerns regarding work allocation with their supervisor. Options and strategies to vary work allocation can be discussed and where agreed implemented and monitored. 14.5.2 If following efforts to resolve concerns as outlined above, the employee still has concerns about their work allocation, they or the union acting on their behalf, may seek a review of their work allocation. 14.5.3 The employee and/or their nominated representative will, in this case raise the concerns regarding work allocation with the supervisor’s direct line manager, specifying steps already undertaken with the supervisor and explaining what concerns still remain. The Manager will review the concerns, consulting with all parties and having regard to the factors specified in subclauses 14.1 to 14.4 of this Agreement. The Manager will make a determination and advise all parties of the decision. 14.5.4 Should the employee and/or their nominated representative not believe that the matter has been satisfactorily dealt with, they can raise the matter with the Head of Element specifying steps undertaken to date to resolve the matter and specifying what concerns still remain. The Head of Element will review the concerns, consulting with all parties and again having regard to the factors specified in subclauses 14.1 to 14.4 of this Agreement. The Head of Element will make a determination and advise all parties of the decision. 14.5.5 Should the employee and/or their nominated representative still not believe that the concern has been satisfactorily dealt with it can be pursued using the University’s individual grievance resolution procedure. This procedure would be entered at Level 3. 14.5.6 Unions may raise work allocation concerns in a particular element through the Professional and Support Staff Consultative Committee and request an investigation be undertaken. Where this is agreed to be appropriate, such an investigation will be undertaken with the outcomes reported back to the PSSCC.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Work Allocation Review Process. Where an employee believes that the work allocation relating to their role is unreasonable, the following process should be applied to seek to resolve such concerns.
View Source

Related to Work Allocation Review Process

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows: