WHAT. OH is concentrating on CM and a portal which provides access to a wide range of functions (ebusiness, etc); REGNET has made concrete technical specifications what functions will be implemented (eg. B2B workflows related to electronic publishing, integration of an ontology subsystem, query subsystem, etc). A detailed analysis will eventually turn out that the existing comparison are not valid to a certain extent. For example within the paragraph “ACCESS TO STANDARDS” the term ‘gateway’ is used in both projects. The concept used in OH refers to a ‘protocol gateway’, within REGNET it refers to ‘subject gateway’, that’s quite different; OH refers to a small piece of a technical implementation meanwhile REGNET addresses a whole range of functions (supported by Subsystem-5). This cannot be equalized by ‘SAME’.
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Combined RTD & Demonstration Project, Combined RTD & Demonstration Project