Weighting. In order to compensate for the discrepancies between the population of first-year students among participating institutions and the sample population, the data in this report have been weighted. The applied weights are shown in Table 3. Table 3: Applied weights University Population of first-year students Completed surveys Applied weight Population % of population Population % of population Xxxxxxx University 579 0.82% 133 0.9% 0.918 Xxxxx University 2916 4.13% 542 3.6% 1.134 Carleton University 4069 5.76% 1017 6.8% 0.844 Concordia University 5669 8.03% 1250 8.4% 0.956 Concordia University of Edmonton 396 0.56% 154 1.0% 0.542 Dalhousie University 2329 3.30% 752 5.1% 0.653 Lakehead University 917 1.30% 346 2.3% 0.559 XxXxxx University 5396 7.64% 764 5.1% 1.489 McMaster University 4940 7.00% 675 4.5% 1.543 Mount Royal University 1037 1.47% 379 2.5% 0.577 Nipissing University 597 0.85% 231 1.6% 0.545 Redeemer University College 144 0.20% 75 0.5% 0.405 Ryerson University 5639 7.99% 205 1.4% 5.800 Saint Mary's University 894 1.27% 298 2.0% 0.633 Xxxxx Xxxxxx University 3185 4.51% 499 3.4% 1.346 The King's University 181 0.26% 97 0.7% 0.393 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx University 623 0.88% 275 1.8% 0.478 Trent University 1437 2.04% 308 2.1% 0.984 Trinity Western University 345 0.49% 124 0.8% 0.587 Université de Moncton 616 0.87% 281 1.9% 0.462 Université de Sherbrooke 2138 3.03% 695 4.7% 0.649 University of King's College 230 0.33% 84 0.6% 0.577 University of Lethbridge 1112 1.58% 357 2.4% 0.657 University of Manitoba 4048 5.73% 885 5.9% 0.964 University of New Brunswick (Fredericton) 920 1.30% 252 1.7% 0.770 University of New Brunswick (Saint Xxxx) 400 0.57% 149 1.0% 0.566 University of Northern British Columbia 347 0.49% 153 1.0% 0.478 University of Xxxxxx 1571 2.23% 657 4.4% 0.504 University of Saskatchewan 1944 2.75% 553 3.7% 0.741 University of the Fraser Valley 2059 2.92% 241 1.6% 1.801 University of Victoria 2583 3.66% 287 1.9% 1.898 University of Waterloo 6079 8.61% 711 4.8% 1.803 University of Winnipeg 1119 1.59% 353 2.4% 0.668 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx University 4139 5.86% 1104 7.4% 0.791
Weighting. For purposes of determining the Achievement Percentage, the Performance Measures shall be weighted as follows: Performance Measure Weighting TSR 50% Production Growth 50%
Weighting. The School must weigh Dual Enrollment courses the same as advanced placement, International Baccalaureate, and Advanced International Certificate of Education courses when grade point averages are calculated.
Weighting. In previous years, CUSC capped the number of students who could be sampled to 1,000. However, for the 2013 survey, universities were able to provide a sample up to the number of students who qualified based on the CUSC criteria for inclusion. In most cases, institutions conducted a census of first-year students, although many larger institutions did not. In order to compensate for the discrepancies between the population of first-year students among participating institutions and the sample population, the data in this report have been weighted. Because of weighting, n-sizes for groups may not sum to the total n-size, as shown in tables in this report. The applied weights are shown in Table 3. Table 3: Applied weights University Population of first-year students Completed surveys Applied weight Population % of population Population % of population Xxxxxxx University 413 0.5% 146 1.0% 0.5730 Xxxxx University 3,827 5.1% 1,078 7.1% 0.7191 Carleton University 4,598 6.1% 1,624 10.7% 0.5735 Concordia University College of Alberta 477 0.6% 148 1.0% 0.6528 Dalhousie University 2,306 3.1% 892 5.9% 0.5236 Xxxxx XxxXxxx University 2,698 3.6% 573 3.8% 0.9537 Lakehead University 1,131 1.5% 511 3.4% 0.4483 XxXxxx University 4,586 6.1% 191 1.3% 4.8634 Mount Royal University 1,127 1.5% 646 4.2% 0.3534 Nipissing University 871 1.2% 395 2.6% 0.4466 Redeemer University College 188 0.3% 125 0.8% 0.3046 Ryerson University 4,864 6.5% 294 1.9% 3.3511 Saint Mary’s University 978 1.3% 345 2.3% 0.5742 Xxxxx Xxxxxx University 3,047 4.1% 658 4.3% 0.9380 St. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx University 919 1.2% 307 2.0% 0.6063 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx University 698 0.9% 177 1.2% 0.7988 Trinity Western University 411 0.5% 164 1.1% 0.5076 Université de Moncton 846 1.1% 473 3.1% 0.3623 Université de Montréal 2,915 3.9% 395 2.6% 1.4948 Université de Sherbrooke 2,077 2.8% 646 4.2% 0.6512 Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières 1,792 2.4% 292 1.9% 1.2431 University of Lethbridge 964 1.3% 420 2.8% 0.4649 University of Manitoba 4,180 5.6% 353 2.3% 2.3985 University of New Brunswick (Fredericton) 990 1.3% 339 2.2% 0.5915 University of New Brunswick (St. Xxxx) 457 0.6% 113 0.7% 0.8192 University of Northern British Columbia 434 0.6% 209 1.4% 0.4206 University of Xxxxxx 1,358 1.8% 668 4.4% 0.4118 University of Saskatchewan 2,927 3.9% 494 3.2% 1.2001 University of the Fraser Valley 1,074 1.4% 375 2.5% 0.5801 University of Victoria 2,450 3.3% 428 2.8% 1.1595 University of Waterloo 6,042 8.0% 358 2.4% 3.4185 University of Winn...
Weighting. Each applicant who has passed the written exam, and has completed the oral interview, and/or practical exam (as applicable) in the selection process shall have the results weighted as follows: Captains Communications Supervisors Written Exam 60% Written Exam 60% Oral Interview 40% Oral Interview 40% Battalion Chiefs Driver Operators Written Exam 35% Written Exam 40% Oral Interview 65% Practical Exam 60% * ARFF, Special Operations, EMS Captain Lieutenants Written Exam 35% Written Exam 60% Oral Interview 65% Oral Interview 40% * The passing score for the Driver Operator practical exam is seventy (70%) percent.
Weighting a. For purposes of determining class size, students in regular education classrooms at kindergarten for two hours, 45 minutes per day and at grades 1-6 for three (3) or more hours per day will be assigned a weight of two (2) students if they have been certified eligible for a special education program by an IEPC (except speech and language.)
Weighting. The weight assigned to a jurisdiction’s countercyclical cap- ital buffer amount is calculated by di- viding the total risk-weighted assets for the national bank’s or Federal sav- ings association’s private sector credit exposures located in the jurisdiction by the total risk-weighted assets for all of the national bank’s or Federal savings association’s private sector credit ex- posures. The methodology a national bank or Federal savings association uses for determining risk-weighted as- sets for purposes of this paragraph (b) must be the methodology that deter- mines its risk-based capital ratios under § 3.10. Notwithstanding the pre- vious sentence, the risk-weighted asset amount for a private sector credit ex- posure that is a covered position under subpart F of this part is its specific risk add-on as determined under § 3.210 multiplied by 12.5.
Weighting. The weighted technical score of a technical Proposal will be calculated by multiplying the technical score of the respective Proposal with the technical weight (in percent). The weighted financial score of a financial Proposal will be calculated by multiplying the ratio of the evaluated price of the lowest financial Offer to the evaluated price of the respective financial Proposal with the financial weight (in percent). The overall score will be calculated by summing up the technical and financial score per Proposal and the Proposal selected for Award of Contract is the one that obtains the highest overall score. The weightings should generally be 80% for the technical Proposal and 20% for the financial Proposal (for more Details see Appendix 4).
Weighting. 1 Details of Suppliers Proposed Project Team Provide the following details for the proposed project team -: Details of the staff assigned to perform the contract in the form of an Organogram of the Project Team, and their roles and responsibilities. The following minimum details for each member of the project team -: Employment history with specific reference to experience of the contractor’s personnel on supply and spraying projects of a similar scale, nature and complexity to those to be tendered under this Framework or experience in so far as they are relevant to health and safety management of Supply and Spraying projects. Details of a minimum of three (3) projects in last three (3) years shall be provided for each member. The requirements for personnel shall be proportionate to the needs of the contract depending on the nature, size and complexity of the works being tendered. Specific additional details may be required for site staff responsible for managing the supply and spraying activities. Pass/Fail 3 Compliance with Specification and Particular Requirements Provide confirmation in writing that the supplies will comply with the requirements of the General Specification. Pass/Fail
Weighting. 5.1 Services can be grouped so that some weighting can be applied to reflect the relative importance of the Services. The weighting should reflect the impact on the Authority's business of the absence of, or degradation of, those elements of the Service. Alternatively, the cost of the Service can be looked at and each group of Services can be allocated a notional Service Charge and a percentage applied to each Service element within that group of Services. If a Service Failure occurs in respect of that Service then the relevant percentage deduction is applied to the notional charge for that group of Service.
