We are Sample Clauses

We are. (a) responsible for correcting faults in the Services and you must provide all necessary assistance to enable us to locate and repair any fault which is our responsibility (b) not responsible for any fault which is on your side of the network termination point and (c) not responsible for any fault which is within the network of a Supplier in which case we will notify that Supplier of the fault and request that the fault be corrected promptly.
We are. Party A (the power company):
We are. With You expects the Pharmacy to be able to provide evidence of full compliance with the obligations set out in this Service Level Agreement, We Are With You’s quality standards arrangements, and other reasonable future arrangements deemed necessary as and when required. It would be expected that the pharmacy would follow GPhC clinical governance guidance. Any incidents or concerns would then be fed into We Are With You’s clinical governance process.
We are. With You shall be entitled to suspend payment and/or vary the amount of the payment if it considers the Pharmacy has committed a serious breach of the Agreement and shall forthwith notify the Pharmacy in writing accordingly.
We are. 49.3.1 responsible for correcting faults in the Services and you must provide all necessary assistance to enable us to locate and repair any fault which is our responsibility; 49.3.2 not responsible for any fault which is on your side of the network termination point; and 49.3.3 not responsible for any fault which is within the network of a Supplier and we will notify that Supplier of the fault and request that the fault be corrected promptly.
We are. With You may require the pharmacist to supply any relevant information required to carry out monitoring and evaluation of the Service. Any Service User information supplied must be anonymised where appropriate and will not be used for any purpose other than monitoring, evaluation and validation.
We are. The Seller: The Buyer:
We are. Part A (Power company): Address: ID No./ Passport No. ……….Issued on……..at ;
We are not in agreement with this contention, mainly for the following reasons: (a) whenever any cut off date is fixed by the legislature, there are bound to few persons who may fall on the wrong side of cut off date, but, that alone cannot be a ground for quashing the said provision. (b) what should be the cut off date and how it should be fixed is the absolute prerogative power of the legislature and the court will be extremely slow in interfering with such type of fixation of cut off date as the court is neither a Cost Accountant, Chartered Accountant or Economist nor the court has the expert knowledge. Such type of cut off date is being fixed, keeping in mind certain factors, including economic aspects of the matter. As stated hereinabove, there are several objects for substitution of Section 35F. Always, all these objects and purposes are not to be mentioned in black and white. They can be inferred also.
We are. Acting Only as Your Agent