Variations on a Theme Sample Clauses

Variations on a Theme. The Ilaşcu test in Kosovo, Nagorno-Karabakh and Eastern Ukraine While the Court set out the test in clear terms in Ilaşcu, and followed it meticulously in other cases regarding Transdniestria, the same cannot be said in the contexts of Kosovo, Eastern Ukraine, or Nagorno-Karabakh. Although none of the judgments in these latter cases – ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ – questioned the Ilaşcu test, and some of them even reaffirmed part of it in principle, they did not apply all of its elements to the facts at hand. in the admissibility decision in ▇▇▇▇▇ and the judgment in Khlebik, the Court did not examine the test’s general limb; while in the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ case before the Grand Chamber, it rejected Azerbaijan’s argument that the state’s obligations under the ECHR were limited to positive ones and as such, it Moldova and Russia, Application No. 3445/13, Second Section Committee, Judgment of 17 September 2019, paras. 26-27, 43-47, 56, 65; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇. 16-17, 36-39; ECtHR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia, Application No. 40942/14, Second Section Committee, Judgment of 17 September 2019, paras. 45-46, 63-66, 78, 93; ECtHR, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia, Application No. 55698/14, Second Section Committee, Judgment of 17 September 2019, paras. 24-25, 42-45, 61, 76; ▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇, paras. 17-18, 34-37; ECtHR, ▇▇▇▇▇ and Surchician v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia, Application No. 22365/10, Second Section Committee, Judgment of 7 January 2020, paras. 45-46, 58-61, 74, 84; ECtHR, ▇▇▇▇▇ and others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia, Application No. 36545/06, Second Section Committee, Judgment of 18 February 2020, paras. 23-24, 47-50. The Court developed a more specific test for Article 13 ECHR, see note 238 below. 171 Ivanţoc, para. 108. 172 Catan, para. 146; ▇▇▇▇▇, para. 152 (extended to July 2010); Turturica and ▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 52; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 32 (October 2010); ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 46 (September 2016); Apcov, para. 45 (April 2012); ▇▇▇▇▇, para. 37; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 41 (May 2011); Braga, para. 39; and ▇▇▇▇▇, para. 60; ▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 40; ▇▇▇▇▇, para. 86; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 60; Stomatii, para. 70; Bobeico, para. 50; ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Magaleas, para. 37; Coţofan, para. 31; Sobco and Ghent, para. 29; Beșleagă, para. 33; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 57; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 63; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 61; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 39; ▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 33; Filin, para. 35 (March 2015); ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 40 (December 2010); ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 43 (March 2017); ▇▇▇▇▇▇, para. 64 (A...