Toll Sample Clauses
A "Toll" clause defines the right to collect fees or charges for the use of a particular asset, service, or infrastructure. In practice, this clause specifies who is entitled to receive toll payments, the circumstances under which tolls are imposed, and the method of calculation or collection. For example, it may apply to the use of a private road, bridge, or utility infrastructure, where users must pay a fee for access. The core function of a Toll clause is to establish clear terms for compensation, ensuring that the party providing the asset or service is fairly remunerated and that users understand their payment obligations.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Toll. 3.1 Customer shall pay Transporter, each month for which TTS is provided, for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement in accordance with Transporter's Toll Schedule TTS, or superseding Toll Schedule(s), on file with and subject to the jurisdiction of the Canada Energy Regulator.
3.2 Unless otherwise mutually agreed to, Customer shall pay Transporter for services nominated hereunder the maximum applicable tolls and charges, as
3.3 Transporter shall have the right to propose, file and make effective with the Canada Energy Regulator or any other body having jurisdiction, revisions to any applicable Toll Schedule, or to propose, file and make effective superseding toll schedules for the purpose of changing the tolls, charges and other provisions thereof effective as to Customer. Said Toll Schedule or superseding toll schedule and any revisions thereof which shall be filed and made effective shall apply to and become a part of this TTS Agreement. The filing of such changes and revisions to any applicable toll schedule shall be without prejudice to the right of Customer to contest or oppose such filing and its effectiveness.
Toll. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Affiliate” of a specified person or entity shall mean a person or entity that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the specified person or entity. For this purpose, “control” shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of a person or entity, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.
Toll. The Borrower will make no filing to amend, modify, waive or terminate any portion of the Incentive Toll Agreement that will adversely affect the Lenders in a material manner.
Toll. The tariffs and discounts for e-toll transactions on GFIP-toll roads are contained in the Government Gazette notice that sets out current toll tariffs on the GFIP-toll roads. These tariffs and discounts are also available on the website, or can be obtained from the e-toll customer service outlets or by phoning the e-toll call centre. The responsibility to pay for e-toll transactions arises when a motor vehicle passes under or through an e-toll plaza. The tariffs for e-toll transactions on Bakwena e-roads are given on the Bakwena website (▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇) and at the Bakwena e-toll plazas.
Toll. 1. Party B can set toll station on Pingdingshan-Linru Expressway upon approval in accordance with relevant state laws and regulations, and Party A has the right to supervise the setup of toll station of Party B in accordance with relevant state regulations.
Toll. Each taxi driver will be responsible for payment of toll and have an up to date Etag. Should the taxi driver not pay a toll and a fine is incurred the taxi driver will reimburse ▇▇▇▇▇▇ for the amount of the fine plus a handling fee of 25% of the fine. Prior to commencing work, each taxi driver will provide to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ details of his/her Etag number and account number for Etag (the fine and handling charge will be sent to Etag supplier for payment).
Toll. ISC agrees to pay the Partnership a toll for requested Coating ---- Services performed during the periods set forth on Schedule 4.1 in the amounts ------------ corresponding to such periods set forth on Schedule 4.1, subject to adjustment ------------ pursuant to Section 4.
Toll. Steven J. Toll joined the Firm in 1979 and has been lead or principal counsel in some of the most highly publicized stock fraud cases over the past 28 years. He has been Managing Partner of the Firm since 1997 and is Head of the Securities Fraud/Investor Protection practice group. Mr. Toll was profiled in the February 1996 Washington Business Journal as one of five attorneys that stand out as the “cream of the crop” in the Washington D.C. legal community. In the Fall 2006 edition of LawDragon, he was named as one of the 500 Leading Lawyers in America. In July 2005, Mr. Toll was lead trial counsel in one of the few securities class actions to go to trial involving Globalstar, a satellite manufacturer. Mr. Toll successfully argued the motions before and during trial and ultimately achieved a settlement of $20 million shortly before the case was scheduled to go to the jury. In approving the settlement, U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel remarked that Mr. Toll and his colleagues had “done a terrific job in presenting the case for the plaintiffs.” Some of Mr. Toll’s other notable cases include those against Lucent Technologies, which was settled in 2001 for approximately $575 million, at the time, the second largest securities class action settlement ever achieved; Southmark Securities Litigation, where he helped achieve a settlement of $70 million from the company’s auditors, Drexel Burnham and Michael Milken; Norman v. Salomon Smith Barney, where he negotiated a $50 million settlement on behalf of customers of Salomon’s Guided Portfolio Management Program, who alleged that Salomon invested their money in companies in order to boost Salomon’s investment banking business, In re ECI Telecom Securities Litigation (E.D.Va.)(telecom company accused of presenting false revenue and earnings figures; recovery of $22.75 million); Gilat Securities Litigation (company accused of misreporting revenue for a period of years -- recovery of $20 million).