Third-Year Review Sample Clauses
The Third-Year Review clause establishes a formal evaluation process for an employee, typically a faculty member, at the end of their third year of employment. This review assesses the individual's performance, progress toward long-term goals such as tenure, and overall fit within the organization. The process may involve submission of work samples, teaching evaluations, and feedback from peers or supervisors. Its core function is to provide an early, structured assessment to identify strengths and areas for improvement, ensuring both the employee and employer have clarity on expectations and future prospects.
Third-Year Review. 9.3.1 If a faculty member is offered and accepts a second three (3)-year term contract, the third annual review of that individual will involve an additional component: review by and advice from a panel of the regular faculty members who have team-taught with the individual during his/her initial term contract at the College. For the library faculty, the panel will also include all regular library faculty members. For faculty hired to teach in specific programs (see Section 5.2.2) the panel will also include the program director.
9.3.2 This panel will be convened by the ▇▇▇▇ who conducts the third annual review of the faculty member and will occur during the spring quarter of the third year of the faculty member’s initial term contract. The faculty member will meet with the ▇▇▇▇ and review panel to discuss the faculty member’s contributions to the College and to assess those things that, in the judgment of the panelists, the faculty member should address in order to meet the criteria for conversion described in Section 11.3.
1. The panel will review the faculty member’s current portfolio and will provide specific suggestions and strategies for making improvements. The ▇▇▇▇’▇ annual evaluation of the faculty member will summarize the conclusions and recommendations of the review panel.
9.3.3 If necessary to permit the participation of at least four panelists (including the ▇▇▇▇), the Third-Year Review may be delayed and occur during the first year of the faculty member’s second term contract.
Third-Year Review. Tenured bargaining unit faculty members will have an 20 interim review in the third year following promotion and a sixth-year major post-tenure review.
Third-Year Review. Tenured bargaining unit faculty members will have an interim review in the third year following promotion and a sixth-year major post-tenure review. The three-year review is conducted jointly by the bargaining unit faculty member and the appropriate department or unit head. As a result of the review, the department or unit head will prepare a brief statement and share it with the bargaining unit faculty member, who may respond in writing. The statement and any response will be placed in the bargaining unit faculty member’s personnel file.
Third-Year Review. At the end of his/her sixth semester of employment (or the equivalent for par-time NTT Faculty) the Chair/Director shall give a written review to the NTT Faculty member. Such written review may be incorporated into the NTT Faculty member’s annual review under section 11.02 of this agreement as long as it meets the requirements below.
a. The purpose of the third year review is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of the NTT Faculty member’s performance of assigned duties consistent with his/her yearly workload assignment, with particular focus on progress toward attaining continuing status. As such, the review shall include a review of the NTT Faculty member’s performance during their employment, along with an assessment by the Chair/Director regarding whether the faculty member is currently making satisfactory progress toward conversion to continuing status. The third year review shall identify areas of strength and weakness and areas that need improvement.
b. The NTT Faculty member shall receive a copy of his/her third year review by December 1 or May 1 (depending on which semester is the NTT Faculty Member’s sixth semester).
c. The NTT Faculty member may submit a written response to this review that will also be included in the personnel file. This response must be submitted within fifteen (15) business days after the NTT Faculty member’s receipt of a copy of the review.