Common use of Third Party Opinion of Lender Value For Objects Requested for Indemnity Clause in Contracts

Third Party Opinion of Lender Value For Objects Requested for Indemnity. The applicant must have lender values assessed by experts other than staff of the applicant, participating venues, lenders, or anyone directly involved with the exhibition. An expert may be, for example, personnel of an auction house or dealer, or an outside curator unaffiliated with the exhibition. An expert should identify conflicts of interest and recuse him/herself. If requested objects are of two or more types, cultures, time periods, etc., it may be necessary to consult more than one expert (they do not need to be from the same source). The Third Party 1) may agree with the lender value, or 2) may believe the lender value is low, or 3) may believe the lender value is high. If the Third Party does not concur with the lender value he/she should suggest an alternate value. State the Third Party’s opinion of the values in the Identification and U.S. Dollar Value of Objects Requested for Indemnity (Items 2 and 3, and as applicable, 4); see instructions, below.

Third Party Opinion of Lender Value For Objects Requested for Indemnity. The applicant must have lender values assessed by experts other than staff of the applicant, participating venues, lenders, or anyone directly involved with the exhibition. An expert may be, for example, personnel of an auction house or dealer, or an outside curator unaffiliated with the exhibition. An expert should identify conflicts of interest and recuse him/herselfher/their self. If requested objects are of two or more types, cultures, time periods, etc., it may be necessary to consult more than one expert (they do not need to be from the same source). The Third Party 1) may agree with the lender value, or 2) may believe the lender value is low, or 3) may believe the lender value is high. If the Third Party does not concur with the lender value he/she she/they should suggest an alternate value. State the Third Party’s opinion of the values in the Identification and U.S. Dollar Value of Objects Requested for Indemnity (Items 2 and 3, and as applicable, 4); see instructions, below.

Third Party Opinion of Lender Value For Objects Requested for Indemnity. The applicant must have lender values assessed by experts other than staff of the applicant, participating venues, lenders, or anyone directly involved with the exhibition. An expert may be, for example, personnel of an auction house or dealer, or an outside curator unaffiliated with the exhibition. An expert should identify conflicts of interest and recuse him/herself. If requested objects are of two or more types, cultures, time periods, etc., it may be necessary to consult more than one expert (they do not need to be from the same source). The Third Party 1) may agree with the lender value as fair market value, or 2) may believe the lender value is lowlower than fair market value, or 3) may believe the lender value is highhigher than fair market value. If the Third Party does not concur with the lender value he/she should suggest an alternate value. State the Third Party’s opinion of the values in the Identification and U.S. Dollar Value of Objects Requested for Indemnity (Items 2 and 3, and as applicable, 4); see instructions, below.

Third Party Opinion of Lender Value For Objects Requested for Indemnity. The applicant must have lender values assessed by experts other than staff of the applicant, participating venues, lenders, or anyone directly involved with the exhibition. An expert may be, for example, personnel of an auction house or dealer, or an outside curator unaffiliated with the exhibition. An expert should identify conflicts of interest and recuse him/herself. If requested objects are of two or more types, cultures, time periods, etc., it may be necessary to consult more than one expert (they do not need to be from the same source). The Third Party 1) may agree with the lender value, or 2) may believe the lender value is low, or 3) may believe the lender value is high. If the Third Party does not concur with the lender value he/she should suggest an alternate value. State the Third Party’s opinion of the values in the Identification and U.S. Dollar Value of Objects Requested for Indemnity (Items 2 and 32, and as applicable, 43); see instructions, below.

Third Party Opinion of Lender Value For Objects Requested for Indemnity. The applicant must have lender values assessed by experts other than staff of the applicant, participating venues, lenders, or anyone directly involved with the exhibition. An expert may be, for example, personnel of an auction house or dealer, or an outside curator unaffiliated with the exhibition. An expert should identify conflicts of interest and recuse him/herselfher/their self. If requested objects are of two or more types, cultures, time periods, etc., it may be necessary to consult more than one expert (they do not need to be from the same source). The Third Party 1) may agree with the lender value, or 2) may believe the lender value is low, or 3) may believe the lender value is high. If the Third Party does not concur with the lender value he/she she/they should suggest an alternate value. State the Third Party’s opinion of the values in the Identification and U.S. Dollar Value of Objects Requested for Indemnity (Items 2 and 32, and as applicable, 43); see instructions, below.

Third Party Opinion of Lender Value For Objects Requested for Indemnity. The applicant must have lender values assessed by experts other than staff of the applicant, participating venues, lenders, or anyone directly involved with the exhibition. An expert may be, for example, personnel of an auction house or dealer, or an outside curator unaffiliated with the exhibition. An expert should identify conflicts of interest and recuse him/herself. If requested objects are of two or more types, cultures, time periods, etc., it may be necessary to consult more than one expert (they do not need to be from the same source). The Third Party 1) may agree with the lender value, or 2) may believe the lender value is low, . or 3) may believe the lender value is high. If the Third Party does not concur with the lender value he/she should suggest an alternate value. State the Third Party’s opinion of the values in the Identification and U.S. Dollar Value of Objects Requested for Indemnity (Items 2 and 32, and as applicable, 43); see instructions, below.

Third Party Opinion of Lender Value For Objects Requested for Indemnity. The applicant must have lender values assessed by experts other than staff of the applicant, participating venues, lenders, or anyone directly involved with the exhibition. An expert may be, for example, personnel of an auction house or dealer, or an outside curator unaffiliated with the exhibition. An expert should identify conflicts of interest and recuse him/herself. If requested objects are of two or more types, cultures, time periods, etc., it may be necessary to consult more than one expert (they do not need to be from the same source). The Third Party 1) may agree with the lender value as fair market value, or 2) may believe the lender value is lowlower than fair market value, or 3) may believe the lender value is highhigher than fair market value. If the Third Party does not concur with the lender value he/she should suggest an alternate value. State the Third Party’s opinion of the values in the Identification and U.S. Dollar Value of Objects Requested for Indemnity (Items 2 and 32, and as applicable, 43); see instructions, below.