THE SAMPLES Clause Samples
The "THE SAMPLES" clause defines the terms under which samples of goods, materials, or products are provided, evaluated, or used within the context of an agreement. Typically, this clause outlines who is responsible for supplying the samples, the standards or specifications they must meet, and the process for approval or rejection. For example, it may specify that the supplier must deliver product samples for quality testing before full-scale production begins. The core function of this clause is to ensure that both parties have a clear understanding of the expectations regarding samples, thereby reducing the risk of disputes over quality or suitability later in the contract.
THE SAMPLES. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represents, warrants and covenants to Institution as follows:
i. all Samples and related information provided to Institution pursuant to this Agreement were collected or will be collected, handled, and transferred in compliance with all applicable state, federal and foreign laws and regulations relating to protection of human research subjects, privacy and security of individually identifiable health information, and standards for notification of breaches of individually identifiable health information applicable and in effect at the time and location of the collection and transfer of such Samples or information and any applicable policies of any institutional review board, privacy board, or ethics committee with jurisdiction over the collection, handling, and transfer of such Samples or information.
ii. all Samples and related information provided to Institution pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided with all direct identifiers removed in accordance with 45 C.F.R. Section 164.514(e)(2). If any Services will entail the provision to Institution of any information that is not fully de-identified in accordance with 45 C.F.R. Section 164.514(b), the corresponding Task Order shall include each of the elements of the mandatory Data Use Agreement as specified in 45 C.F.R. Section 164.514(e)(4)(ii)(A)-(C).
B. Institution shall not transfer any Samples or other materials obtained or received in connection with this Agreement, or any derivatives thereof, to any third party without Novartis prior written approval.
C. Institution shall use the Samples and materials obtained or received in connection with this Agreement solely for the performance of the Services in Institution’s laboratories under suitable containment conditions in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations and may make Component Improvements incidental to performing the Services. Institution shall not analyze the samples or materials other than as necessary to perform the Services.
D. Upon completion of the Services under any Task Order, or upon termination of any Task Order, Institution shall return to Novartis or destroy, as requested by Novartis, any unused samples and materials obtained or received in connection with this Agreement.
▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ intends to use the results of the Services for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a U.S. federal law that regulates that manufacture, use, or sale of drugs. The foregoing does not in any...
THE SAMPLES subject to Sub-Section 6.6 hereof regarding third Person Consents, all of the Seller's right, title and interest in and pursuant to the Assumed Contracts, including all rights which the Seller may have to set off or compensate against amounts owing under the Assumed Contracts; and 3.
THE SAMPLES. We analyzed six samples of silicates. The compounds are presented in Table 2.1. Three of the samples were natural crystals, that is, two orthopyroxenes, one of them magnesium-rich (sample 4: enstatite, origin Kiloza, Tanzania), one with a higher iron content (sample 6: hy- persthene, origin: ▇▇▇▇ Island, Labrador), and one is an iron-rich olivine (sample1: olivine, origin: Sri Lanka). See also ▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. (1998) and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. (2012) for infrared data of the enstatite and the olivine crystals. The three other samples, that is, sample 2, sample 3 (which is the crystalline counterpart of sample 2), and sample 5, were synthesized for this analysis in laboratories at AIU Jena and Osaka University. The amorphous Mg0.9Fe0.1SiO3 sample has been synthesized by quenching of a melt according to the procedure described by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. (1995). The crystalline counterpart was obtained by slow cooling of silicate material produced under Ar atmosphere in an electric arc, similarly to that described for Mg/Fe oxides in ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. (1995). We were motivated in the choice of the sample by the almost absolute absence of XAFS measurements for silicates of astronomical interest. In order to produce laboratory analogs of interstellar dust silicates, four main criteria were considered: • The samples (or a mixture of these samples) should reflect the interstellar dust silicates of “mean”cosmic composition. • The samples have an olivine or pyroxene stoichiometry. • The samples contain differences in the Mg:Fe ratio. • The sample set contains both amorphous and crystalline silicates. The composition of the samples present in our study is chosen in such a way that mix- tures of these samples can reflect the cosmic silicate mixture as described by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇ (1984). According to observations of 10 and 20 µm feature in the infrared, the silicate dust mixture consists of an olivine and pyroxene stoichiometry (▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al., 2004; ▇▇▇ et al., 2007). The dominating component seems to be silicates of an olivine stoichiometry (▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al., 2004). Min et al. (2007) show that the stoichiometry lies in between that of olivine and pyroxene, which suggests a mixture of these two silicate types. Therefore, our sample set contains both pyroxenes and an olivine silicate. The samples show variations in the Mg:Fe ratio. These variations reflect the results from previous studies of interstellar dust. Kemper et al. (2004) infer from the observed stellar extinction that Mg/(Mg + Fe)...
THE SAMPLES. The Contractor shall draw samples of schools which shall permit the identification of year- on-year changes in responses to key survey questions. The achieved sample shall be designed to meet the criteria set out below and shall yield adequate numbers for analysis even after attrition in the second and third years: • Allow a statistically robust identification of year-on-year changes of around U+5% or larger in responses to key survey questions. • Allow a statistically robust identification of differences between schools of around +U U10% to be detected (for example, between large and small schools and those with high and low proportions of; SEN, FSM-eligible and EAL pupils)F1F. To detect a difference of 10 percentage points in survey responses (for example, the proportion of schools with high FSM rates responding that they do X was 10 percentage points higher than for schools with low FSM rates), shall require a sample of 180 schools in each subgroup. The Contractors shall investigate subgroups representing FSM, EAL, and SEN. If the subgroups are a minimum of 25% in size (for example, comparing 25% of schools to the other 75%, or comparing pairs of groups each making up 25% of the population), the target final achieved sample shall be 720 schools. This number shall also be required to be able to detect a 5% change over time across all schools in the whole sample, and to allow modelling of pupils outcomes for a range of different school ‘types’ (as identified by the surveys). Based on these calculations, the Contractor shall draw a representative sample from their national schools database for the survey element of the research. The sampling frame shall include all maintained schools in England which have Reception, Year 1 and Year 2: primary, infants and first schools in representative proportions. The sample shall be stratified by school size, region and KS1 attainment. The Contractor shall use all reasonable endeavours to achieve a sample of 720 schools at the end of the three years. In order to allow for attrition it is therefore necessary for the Contractor to achieve 960 schools in the first round of the survey; 816 in the second round of the survey, and a final achieved sample of 720 schools.