Test Team Structure Sample Clauses

Test Team Structure. MOT&E may be conducted by a multi-Service test team, or concurrently with separate test teams, as the participating Services deem necessary for a given program. The basic MOT&E test team composition is shown in Annex C. The lead OTA Test Director (TD) will exercise test management authority over the test teams. The lead OTA TD’s responsibilities include integration of test requirements and scheduling test events, but not operational control of test teams. Service test teams work through a supporting OTA Deputy Test Director (DTD) or a senior Service representative. The supporting OTA DTD exercises operational control or test management authority over their Service test teams. Additionally, they will help correlate and present test results as directed by the lead OTA TD. In addition, the supporting OTA DTD will represent their Service's interests and be responsible, at least in an administrative sense, for resources and personnel provided by their Services. MOT&E team composition below the level of the supporting OTA DTD will be determined on a program-by-program basis by individual Services.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Test Team Structure. MOT&E may be conducted by a multiservice test team or concurrently with separate test teams, as the participating agencies deem necessary for a given program. The basic test team structure is shown in enclosure (4). Service test teams work through a Service Deputy Test Director (DTD) or a senior Service representative. The multiservice Test Director (TD) will exercise test management authority over the test teams. His responsibilities will include integration of test requirements and efficient scheduling of test events, but not operational control of the test teams. The DTDs will exercise operational control or test management authority over their Service test teams in accordance with their Service directives. Additionally, they will help in the correlation and presentation of test results as directed by the Test Director. In addition, the DTDs will represent their Service's interests and be responsible, at least in an administrative sense, for resources and personnel provided by their Services. Test team structure below the level of the DTD will be determined on a program-by-program basis by the individual Services.
Sample 1

Related to Test Team Structure

  • Framework Management Structure 2.1.1 The Supplier shall provide a suitably qualified nominated contact (the “Supplier Framework Manager”) who will take overall responsibility for delivering the Goods and/or Services required within this Framework Agreement, as well as a suitably qualified deputy to act in their absence.

  • Access Toll Connecting Trunk Group Architecture 9.2.1 If CBB chooses to subtend a Verizon access Tandem, CBB’s NPA/NXX must be assigned by CBB to subtend the same Verizon access Tandem that a Verizon NPA/NXX serving the same Rate Center Area subtends as identified in the LERG.

  • Management Structure Describe the overall management approach toward planning and implementing the contract. Include an organization chart for the management of the contract, if awarded. 3.2

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5.1 The Employee agrees to participate in the performance management system that the Employer adopts or introduces for the Employer, management and municipal staff of the Employer.

  • Agreement Structure 2.1 An “Agreement” hereunder shall consist of this Master Agreement, the Schedule, and their applicable attachments and represents the complete and exclusive agreement between the Parties regarding the subject matter of the Schedule, and replaces any prior oral or written communications between the Parties relating thereto. Each Lease is effective when the Schedule containing such Lease is executed by the Parties thereto.

  • FEE STRUCTURE In consideration of Consultant providing services, Municipality shall pay Consultant for Services performed in accordance with Exhibit A – List of Services and Fee Schedule.

  • Report Structure Provides an analysis of each error type (by error code). The report is in descending order by count of each error code and provides the following: • Error Type (by error code) • Count of each error type • Percent of each error type • Cumulative percent • Error Description • CLEC Caused Count of each error code • Percent of aggregate by CLEC caused count • Percent of CLEC caused count • BellSouth Caused Count of each error code • Percent of aggregate by BellSouth caused count • Percent of BellSouth by BellSouth caused count. Data Retained Relating to CLEC Experience Relating to BellSouth Performance • Report Month • Total Number of Lsrs Received • Total Number of Errors by Type (by Error Code) - CLEC caused error • Report Month • Total Number of Errors by Type (by Error Code) - BellSouth System Error SQM Disaggregation - Analog/Benchmark SQM Level of Disaggregation SQM Analog/Benchmark • Not Applicable • Not Applicable SEEM Measure SEEM Measure No Tier I Tier II O-5: Flow-Through Error Analysis SEEM Disaggregation - Analog/Benchmark SEEM Disaggregation SEEM Analog/Benchmark • Not Applicable • Not Applicable O-6: CLEC LSR Information O-6: CLEC LSR Information Definition A list with the flow through activity of LSRs by CC, PON and Ver, issued by each CLEC during the report period. Exclusions • Fatal Rejects • LSRs submitted manually Business Rules The CLEC mechanized ordering process includes all LSRs, including supplements (subsequent versions) which are submitted through one of the three gateway interfaces (TAG, EDI, and LENS), that flow through and reach a status for a FOC to be issued. The CLEC mechanized ordering process does not include LSRs which are submitted manually (for example, fax and courier). Calculation Not Applicable

  • Governance Structure The Academy shall be organized and administered as a Michigan nonprofit corporation under the direction of the Academy Board and pursuant to the governance structure as set forth in the Bylaws. The Academy’s Board of Directors shall meet monthly unless another schedule is mutually agreed upon by the President and the Academy. The Academy shall not delegate this duty of organization and administration of the Academy without the express affirmative consent of the University.

  • Joint Network Implementation and Grooming Process Upon request of either Party, the Parties shall jointly develop an implementation and grooming process (the “Joint Grooming Process” or “Joint Process”) which may define and detail, inter alia:

  • Project Management Plan 1 3.4.1 Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control 2 activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.