Technical Capacity for purposes of evaluation Clause Samples
The 'Technical Capacity for purposes of evaluation' clause defines the criteria and standards by which a party's technical abilities are assessed during a selection or bidding process. It typically outlines the specific qualifications, experience, or resources that must be demonstrated, such as prior project experience, certifications, or availability of specialized equipment. This clause ensures that only parties with adequate technical expertise are considered, thereby reducing the risk of project failure due to insufficient capability.
Technical Capacity for purposes of evaluation. 3.2.1 Subject to the provisions of Clause 2.2, the following categories of experience would qualify as Technical Capacity and eligible experience (the “Eligible Experience”) in relation to eligible projects as stipulated in Clauses 3.2.3 and 3.2.4 (the “Eligible Projects”):
Category 1: Project experience on Eligible Projects in Food Processing Sector that qualify under Clause 3.
Technical Capacity for purposes of evaluation. 3.2.1 An Applicant’s experience shall be measured in terms of meeting the Threshold Technical Capacity stated in Clause 2.2.2(A) and Financial Capacity stated in Clause 2.2.2(B). Overall, eligibility under provisions of Clause 2.2, shall be reckoned as requisite Technical Capacity to qualify as eligible experience (the "Eligible Experience") in relation to eligible projects (the "Eligible Projects"):
3.2.2 Experience for any activity relating to an Eligible Project shall not be claimed by two or more Members of the Consortium. In other words, no double counting by a Consortium in respect of the same experience shall be permitted in any manner whatsoever.
Technical Capacity for purposes of evaluation. 3.2.1 Subject to the provisions of Clause 2.2, the following categories of experience for Non RDSO approved firms would qualify as Technical Capacity and eligible experience (the "Eligible Experience") in relation to eligible projects as stipulated in Clauses 3.2.3 and 3.2.4 (the "Eligible Projects"): Category 1: Supply of EI to Indian Railways. Category 2: Supply of MSDAC/SSDAC to Indian Railways Category 3: Supply of IPS to Indian Railways. Category 4: Supply of EI to a purchaser other than Indian Railways Category 5: Supply of MSDAC/SSDAC to a purchaser other than Indian Railways Category 6: Supply of IPS to a purchaser other than Indian Railways Applicant shall submit for Electronic Interlocking and Digital Axle Counter documentary proof of Independent validation as per CENELEC standards or equivalent standard with complete safety case and proven track record of working of EI and DAC for passenger services.
Technical Capacity for purposes of evaluation. 3.2.1 Subject to the provisions of Clause 2.2, the following categories of experience would qualify as Technical Capacity and eligible experience (the “Eligible Experience”) in relation to eligible projects as stipulated in Clauses 3.2.3 and 3.2.4 (the "Eligible Projects”) :
Category 1: Design, manufacture and supply of Mainline Diesel Electric Locomotive(s) of 6000 HP and above with AC/AC transmission.
Category 2: Design, manufacture and supply of Mainline Diesel Electric Locomotive(s) of 4000 to 6000 HP with AC/AC transmission. Category 3: Design, manufacture and supply of Mainline Diesel Electric Locomotive(s) of 4000 HP and above with AC/DC transmission. Category 4: Design, manufacture and supply of Mainline Diesel Electric Locomotives of less than 4000 HP.
3.2.2 Eligible Experience in respect of each category shall be measured only for Eligible Projects for the past 10 financial years preceding the Application Due Date.
3.2.3 For a project to qualify as an Eligible Project under Categories 1, 2, 3 & 4, the entity claiming experience should have held, in the company supplying the Mainline Diesel Electric Locomotives comprising the Eligible Project, a minimum of 26% (twenty six per cent) equity during the entire year for which Eligible Experience is being claimed.
3.2.4 For a project to qualify as an Eligible Project under Categories 1, 2, 3 and 4, the Applicant should have produced the Mainline Diesel Electric Locomotives based on its (including an Associate) ownership of / unrestricted access to product and process technology for either the complete Mainline Diesel Electric Locomotive or at least its major components (engine with alternator, traction motor, propulsion control system with IGBT and engine control system). .
3.2.5 The Applicant shall quote experience in respect of a particular Eligible Project under any one category only, even though the Applicant (either individually or along with a member of the Consortium) may have played multiple roles in the cited project. Double counting for a particular Eligible Project shall not be permitted in any form.
3.2.6 Subject to the provisions of Clause 3.2.7, an Applicant’s experience shall be measured and stated in terms of a score (the “Experience Score”). The Experience Score shall be computed as one point for each Mainline Diesel Electric Locomotive included in an Eligible Project and then multiplied by the applicable factor in Table 3.2.6 below. In case the Applicant has experience across different...
