TECHNICAL APPENDIX Clause Samples

TECHNICAL APPENDIX a. Further details in relation to ▇▇▇▇▇▇'s requirement for a Digital (Smart) Building are set out in the Technical Appendix below.

TECHNICAL APPENDIX. Cosine measure of complementarity ik jk ik jk Import-Export Similarity (IES): jk jk ik jk

TECHNICAL APPENDIX. The Bayoumi and Eichengreen Optimum Currency Area Index REGIONAL INTEGRATION AND EXCHANGE RATE ARRANGEMENTS 88 V Table 5.A2. Source of Output Co-Movements REGIONAL INTEGRATION AND EXCHANGE RATE ARRANGEMENTS Table 5.A5. Correlations of Terms of Trade Appendix 91 V REGIONAL INTEGRATION AND EXCHANGE RATE ARRANGEMENTS 92 Table 5.A6. Inflation Performance Appendix 93 Table 5.A8. Optimum Currency Area Index: Regression Results 1. Exchange Market Pressure4 Sources: IMF, World Economic Outlook, Direction of Trade Statistics; and IMF staff estimates. Note: One, two, and three asterisks indicate significance at 10, 5, and 1 percent, respectively. 1For the definitions of regressors, see Box 5.1. 2All variables included in the regressions are calculated over the specified sample period. 3With 53 countries covered by the sample, there are 1,378 observations in total, out of which 1,308 observations are used in estimation after excluding missing values. 4EMP is defined as the average of standard deviations of percentage changes in bilateral exchange rate and foreign reserves. 5SD(EXR) refers to the standard deviation of percentage changes in bilateral exchange rate. 0.176 0.169 0.174 0.169 0.162 0.157 0.083 0.075 0.092 0.088 0.088 0.086 0.235 0.180 0.225 0.179 0.212 0.167 0.158 0.092 0.160 0.104 0.152 0.101 0.179 0.171 0.177 0.169 0.163 0.155 0.094 0.086 0.100 0.093 0.093 0.086 0.226 0.157 0.224 0.158 0.209 0.144 0.155 0.069 0.164 0.079 0.159 0.075 0.191 0.189 0.191 0.185 0.177 0.173 0.109 0.099 0.118 0.107 0.113 0.102 0.324 0.184 0.328 0.181 0.306 0.163 0.300 0.114 0.307 0.112 0.299 0.099 0.213 0.157 0.190 0.158 0.188 0.145 0.084 0.060 0.089 0.073 0.087 0.071 0.229 0.162 0.236 0.168 0.224 0.159 0.161 0.070 0.167 0.074 0.162 0.070 1. Central America1 Costa Rica Dominican Republic El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua Panama Average of own indices2 1970–79 1980–891990–98 1970–79 1980–89 1990–98 1970–79 1980–89 1990–98 1970–79 1980–89 1990–98 1970–79 1980–89 1990–98 1970–79 1980–89 1990–98 2. EMU Countries1, 3 France 0.119 0.136 0.147 0.110 0.116 0.122 0.109 0.121 0.127 0.039 0.045 0.051 0.040 0.041 0.045 0.043 0.045 0.048 Italy 0.145 0.156 0.154 0.136 0.135 0.130 0.134 0.139 0.133 0.066 0.062 0.058 0.068 0.060 0.054 0.070 0.063 0.055 Spain 0.183 0.167 0.171 0.176 0.157 0.152 0.166 0.150 0.149 0.094 0.068 0.068 0.102 0.076 0.070 0.098 0.074 0.069 Portugal 0.166 0.208 0.186 0.164 0.194 0.174 0.153 0.187 0.167 0.069 0.107 0.086 0.079 0.111 0.093 0.076 0.107 0.090 Ireland...

TECHNICAL APPENDIX. [This appendix consists of technical engineering information and is not included in the filing of the agreement with the SEC as being not material to investor decisions.]

TECHNICAL APPENDIX. Software description

TECHNICAL APPENDIX. In a technical appendix to the proposal, the offeror may submit demonstrations of previous work or mock-ups of proposed work such as screen captures, example data dictionaries, templates for contact materials, etc. as evidence of the technical response to the “Ability to Conduct a Web Survey Data Collection” and “Ability to Collect and Document Paradata” factors. This technical appendix does not have page limitations and does not count against the aforementioned Technical proposal page limit. The technical appendix should not include narrative. Information improperly included in the technical appendix will not be considered. The Key Personnel resumes will be used in conjunction with the technical narratives and information provided in Part I to develop a confidence and risk assessment. Failure to provide the requested Key Personnel resumes will result in a lower confidence and higher risk of failure to perform. The offeror shall submit resumes of the key personnel proposed showing their depth and breadth of knowledge, capabilities, and/or work experience related to disciplines critical to the successful completion of program objectives similar to those described in the SOW. Each Resume shall not exceed two pages and does not count against the aforementioned Technical narrative page limit. The Key Personnel requested are the Research Lead, corresponding to Task 7, and the Lead Methodologist, evidencing any or all of the following expertise: frame development and sample design, questionnaire design, paradata collection and monitoring, and/or contact and cooperation methodology. Skills and experience should be applicable to web survey data collections. Offerors may propose other key persons as deemed necessary, however only the requested key persons will be considered in the evaluation. Offerors should use the attached Past Performance Evaluation Form to request past performance information for this procurement. Offerors should ensure that past performance information is submitted directly to the contracting officer, as delineated on the form. Offerors should not submit the form themselves in the proposal package. Offerors need only provide a list of past performance reviews requested to permit verification of received forms. Past Performance is not required to receive award, and offerors with no past performance will be rated as neutral for this factor.

TECHNICAL APPENDIX. Text collection and pre-processing

TECHNICAL APPENDIX. The software RARL2 computes a stable rational L2­approximation of specified order n to a given stable (analytic in the complement of the unit disk) matrix function. This can be the transfer function of a multivariable discrete­time stable system. This function can be given in one of the following forms