Common use of Takeover Statutes and Charter Provisions Clause in Contracts

Takeover Statutes and Charter Provisions. SPAC Board has taken all action necessary so that the restrictions on a “business combination” (as such term is used in Section 203 of the DGCL) contained in Section 203 of the DGCL or any similar restrictions under any foreign Laws will be inapplicable to this Agreement and the SPAC Merger. As of the date of this Agreement, no “fair price,” “moratorium,” “control share acquisition” or other antitakeover Law or similar domestic or foreign Law applies with respect to SPAC in connection with this Agreement or the SPAC Merger. As of the date of this Agreement, there is no stockholder rights plan, “poison pill” or similar antitakeover agreement or plan in effect to which SPAC is subject, party or otherwise bound.

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Agreement and Plan of Merger (Pacifico Acquisition Corp.), Agreement and Plan of Merger (Pacifico Acquisition Corp.), Agreement and Plan of Merger (CF Acquisition Corp. V)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Takeover Statutes and Charter Provisions. SPAC Board has taken all action necessary so that the restrictions on a “business combination” (as such term is used in Section 203 of the DGCL) contained in Section 203 of the DGCL or any similar restrictions under any foreign Laws will be inapplicable to this Agreement and the SPAC MergerTransactions. As of the date of this Agreement, no “fair price,” “moratorium,” “control share acquisition” or other antitakeover Law or similar domestic or foreign Law applies with respect to SPAC in connection with this Agreement or the SPAC MergerTransactions. As of the date of this Agreement, there is no stockholder rights plan, “poison pill” or similar antitakeover agreement or plan in effect to which SPAC is subject, party or otherwise bound.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Business Combination Agreement (Mountain Crest Acquisition Corp. V)

Takeover Statutes and Charter Provisions. SPAC Board Each of the board of directors of SLAM has taken all action necessary so that the restrictions on a “business combination” (as such term is used in Section 203 of the DGCL) contained in Section 203 of the DGCL or any similar restrictions under any applicable foreign Laws will be inapplicable to this Agreement and the SPAC Merger. As of the date of this Agreement, no “fair price,” “moratorium,” “control share acquisition” or other applicable antitakeover Law or similar domestic or foreign Law applies with respect to SPAC SLAM in connection with this Agreement or the SPAC Merger. As of the date of this Agreement, there is no stockholder rights plan, “poison pill” or similar antitakeover agreement or plan in effect to which SPAC SLAM is subject, party or otherwise bound.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Business Combination Agreement (Slam Corp.)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Takeover Statutes and Charter Provisions. The SPAC Board has taken all action necessary so that the restrictions on a “business combination” (as such term is used in Section 203 of the DGCL) contained in Section 203 of the DGCL or any similar restrictions under any foreign Laws will be inapplicable to this Agreement and the SPAC MergerArrangement (including the Share Exchanges). As of the date of this Agreement, no “fair price,” “moratorium,” “control share acquisition” or other antitakeover Law or similar domestic or foreign Law applies with respect to SPAC in connection with this Agreement or the SPAC MergerArrangement (including the Share Exchanges). As of the date of this Agreement, there is no stockholder rights plan, “poison pill” or similar antitakeover agreement or plan in effect to which SPAC is subject, party or otherwise bound.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Business Combination Agreement (CF Acquisition Corp. VI)

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.