STREAMLINED REVIEW PROCESS Clause Samples

STREAMLINED REVIEW PROCESS. The USACE may use a streamlined modification review process for changes to the Program reflecting Adaptive Management of the Program, Credit releases, changes in Credit Releases and Credit Release schedules, and changes that the USACE determines are not significant. In this event, the USACE will notify the IRT members and Program Sponsor of this determination and provide them with copies of the proposed modification. IRT members and Program Sponsor will have 30 days to notify the USACE if they have concerns with the proposed modification. If IRT members or Program Sponsor notify the USACE of such concerns, the USACE will attempt to resolve those concerns. The USACE will notify the IRT members and Program Sponsor of his intent regarding the proposed modification within 60 days of providing the notice to the IRT members. If no IRT member objects, by initiating the dispute resolution process (33 C.F.R. 332.8) within 15 days of receipt of the notification, the USACE will notify the Program Sponsor of its final decision and, if approved, arrange for it to be signed by the appropriate parties. RCRCD In-Lieu Fee Program C-2 As individual ILF Projects are proposed and Development Plans approved by formal Instrument Modifications per Exhibit C, they will be incorporated into Exhibit D as subparts beginning with Exhibit D1 and continuing sequentially. RCRCD In-Lieu Fee Program Exhibit D As individual ILF Projects are proposed and Interim Management Plans approved by formal Instrument Modifications per Exhibit C they will be incorporated into Exhibit E as subparts beginning with Exhibit E1and continuing sequentially. RCRCD In-Lieu Fee Program Exhibit E As individual ILF Projects are proposed and Long-Term Management Plans approved by formal Instrument Modifications per Exhibit C they will be incorporated into Exhibit F as subparts beginning with Exhibit F1and continuing sequentially. RCRCD In-Lieu Fee Program Exhibit F U.S. Army Corps of Engineers RCRCD letterhead [date] Los Angeles District – Regulatory Division ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇. Los Angeles, CA 90017 Subject: Statement of Sale for [Number] Credits from the RCRCD In-Lieu Fee Program to [Permittee Name] The Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District has an agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Los Angeles District to operate an In-Lieu-Fee Program. This letter confirms the sale of [Number of Credits] credits of [Resource Type A], and [Number of Credits] credits of [Resource Type B]. These credits ar...

STREAMLINED REVIEW PROCESS. If the HPO determines that the Undertaking does not meet the definition of exempt activities listed in APPENDIX C and requires Section 106 review, the HPO will follow the review process outlined below. A. Definition the APE and Identification of Historic Properties. 1. Per 36 C.F.R. § 800.4, the HPO will determine and document the APE for the undertaking, and will take the steps necessary to identify and evaluate historic properties within the APE.‌ 2. For ground-disturbing activities, the HPO will determine whether further archaeological survey is warranted, supported by existing information from previously conducted archaeological surveys.‌ a) If the HPO determines that no further efforts are warranted because the area has been previously surveyed for cultural resources and no historic properties are present, or due to the low potential for intact subsurface remains as delineated in the 2014 Archaeological Sensitivity Model attached to this Agreement as APPENDIX F - CONFIDENTIAL, that determination will be documented for inclusion in the annual report, and no additional consultation is required. b) If the HPO determines that further efforts are needed to identify archaeological sites in sensitive areas, the archaeological investigations will be sufficient to identify any potentially eligible sites present within the APE and determine conclusively their eligibility for listing in the NRHP. NASA will submit the investigation findings to the SHPO and seek concurrence on NASA’s determination of eligibility within 30 days of confirmed receipt of the request. 3. If, as a result of these investigations, the HPO determines that there are no historic properties within the APE, or that an undertaking has no possibility of affecting cultural resources, the HPO will document a determination of “No Historic Properties Affected” for the undertaking and include it in the Annual Report per Stipulation X, and NASA has no further obligations under Stipulation IV.‌ 4. If the HPO identifies historic properties within the APE, the HPO will continue to Stipulation IV.B. B. Assessment of Adverse Effects 1. The HPO will apply the criteria of adverse effects to historic properties (as defined in 36 C.F.R. § 800.5(a)(1)) and will make one of the following determinations:

STREAMLINED REVIEW PROCESS. The proposed Project Undertaking must be an activity listed within this section. These undertakings shall be known as “streamlined activities” for purposes of reference. A reminder that most of the USMMA is within the boundary of the HD. The following undertakings shall not require further SHPO review:

STREAMLINED REVIEW PROCESS. For a Project Undertaking to qualify for the streamlined review process an activity must be listed within this section. These undertakings shall be known as “streamlined activities” for purposes of reference. If the CRM determines that an undertaking qualifies for streamlined review then no SHPO consultation is required and the CRM shall document this in an Annual Report prepared by the designated CRM as noted in Stipulation VII. A. The following undertakings shall not require further SHPO review when the specified requirements are followed:

STREAMLINED REVIEW PROCESS. Where the Park Section 106 Coordinator determines the following criteria are met for a proposed undertaking, no further consultation is required unless otherwise specifically requested by the SHPO/THPO, Federally recognized Indian Tribe(s) or Native Hawaiian organization(s), or the ACHP.