Stakeholder Forums Clause Samples

Stakeholder Forums. The primary communication tool among the Stakeholders will be through forums. At a minimum, the Stakeholders will convene periodic meetings (quarterly) to review progress on goals, discuss action items put before them, and provide a forum for public input. Ideally, these meetings should be well-publicized and open to the public to allow for additional input. The agenda for the first Stakeholder meeting should address the following issues: T Background on the Project T Goals of the Involvement Process as seen by Clermont Staff (Stakeholder input to agree on goals and provide additional goals) T Representation of the Stakeholders (are there any gaps?) T Roles and responsibilities of Stakeholders T Road map of the process and areas for input, action (when to meet again, best ways to communicate) T Set action items to accomplish by next meeting T Forum for comments and questions The agenda for subsequent meetings will be driven in large part by the goals and action items set by the Stakeholders at the first meeting. Specific tasks (such as the development and dissemination of a brochure on the water quality monitoring stations in the county) will be reviewed at these forums.
View Source
Stakeholder Forums sequentially developed activities under the three main themes of the HBP: future medicine, future neuroscience and future ICT/robotics. The activities related to each of the three main issues moved from activities outlining the issues toward more specific and solution-oriented stakeholder involvement activities. All activities were followed up with a newsletter outlining recommendations made during the activities (see Tables 4, 5 and 6 for the complete overview). Among the main outcomes of the stakeholder forums are the interactions and discussions initiated among external research and the HBP experts. Recommendations from the seminars have also made it into SP8 responses to Ethics Reviews of the Project (concretely the recommendation to perform an ‘Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)’. Below we present the recommendations coming out from the two seminars we held so far, and a few experts from commentary we received from HBP researchers following our events. All results are publicly available. • Clarify responsibilities: Who is responsible for data protection and security? • Perform privacy impact assessment • Follow ‘good anonymisation practices’ as laid out in EU Opinion 05/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques • Make sure subcontractors follow good anonymisation techniques. Even better: avoid subcontracting • Stamp data with the type of consent given • Develop a Partnering Project on the privacy concerns in the Core Project • Seek informed consent where at all possible • Improve transparency and trust by: − Engaging in collaboration and dialogue with patient associations and external experts − Manage expectations by being realistic about outcomes and the research process to patients, medical professionals and the public − Listen to concerns and adapt accordingly • Communicate more about the research being done in the Subprojects • The Project should still have several objectives, e.g.: − Assist in understanding how brains fail − Take a particular disease or drug design as a starting point − Network building between internal and external researchers could be a success in itself • Develop plans for how the horizontal integration should take place. It will not ‘just happen’. • Find a point of connection between bottom-up and top-down approaches and create a bridge between the molecular and the cognitive level (multi-level integration) • Prioritize building in plasticity and neuromodulation in the ICT brain models • Set up a ‘brainstorming structure mechanism’ where...
View Source

Related to Stakeholder Forums

  • Appropriate forum The parties agree that the courts of England are the most appropriate and convenient courts to settle any Dispute and, accordingly, that they will not argue to the contrary.

  • Applicable Law; Forum, Venue and Jurisdiction (a) This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law. (b) Each of the Partners and each Person holding any beneficial interest in the Partnership (whether through a broker, dealer, bank, trust company or clearing corporation or an agent of any of the foregoing or otherwise): (i) irrevocably agrees that any claims, suits, actions or proceedings (A) arising out of or relating in any way to this Agreement (including any claims, suits or actions to interpret, apply or enforce the provisions of this Agreement or the duties, obligations or liabilities among Partners or of Partners to the Partnership, or the rights or powers of, or restrictions on, the Partners or the Partnership), (B) brought in a derivative manner on behalf of the Partnership, (C) asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, or other employee of the Partnership or the General Partner, or owed by the General Partner, to the Partnership or the Partners, (D) asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware Act or (E) asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine shall be exclusively brought in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, in each case regardless of whether such claims, suits, actions or proceedings sound in contract, tort, fraud or otherwise, are based on common law, statutory, equitable, legal or other grounds, or are derivative or direct claims; (ii) irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in connection with any such claim, suit, action or proceeding; (iii) agrees not to, and waives any right to, assert in any such claim, suit, action or proceeding that (A) it is not personally subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or of any other court to which proceedings in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware may be appealed, (B) such claim, suit, action or proceeding is brought in an inconvenient forum, or (C) the venue of such claim, suit, action or proceeding is improper; (iv) expressly waives any requirement for the posting of a bond by a party bringing such claim, suit, action or proceeding; and (v) consents to process being served in any such claim, suit, action or proceeding by mailing, certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy thereof to such party at the address in effect for notices hereunder, and agrees that such services shall constitute good and sufficient service of process and notice thereof; provided, nothing in clause (v) hereof shall affect or limit any right to serve process in any other manner permitted by law.

  • Governing Law; Forum This Agreement and all disputes or controversies arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to principles of conflicts of laws. Each Holder agrees that it shall bring any litigation with respect to any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement, exclusively in the Delaware Court of Chancery (and if jurisdiction in the Delaware Court of Chancery shall be unavailable, the state and federal courts in the State of Delaware) (together with the appellate courts thereof, the “Chosen Courts”). In connection with any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement, each Holder hereby irrevocably and unconditionally (i) submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Chosen Courts, (ii) waives any objection that such Person may now or hereafter have to the laying of venue of any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement in the Chosen Courts, (iii) waives any objection that the Chosen Courts are an inconvenient forum or as not having jurisdiction over either the Corporation or the Holder, (iv) agrees that service of process in any such action or proceeding shall be effective if notice is given in accordance with Section 5(d), although nothing contained in this Agreement shall affect the right to serve process in any other manner permitted by law and (v) agrees not to seek a transfer of venue on the basis that another forum is more convenient. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (A) nothing in this Section 5(e) shall prohibit any party from seeking or obtaining orders for conservatory or interim relief from any court of competent jurisdiction and (B) each Holder agrees that any judgment issued by a Chosen Court may be recognized, recorded, registered or enforced in any jurisdiction in the world and waives any and all objections or defenses to the recognition, recording, registration or enforcement of such judgment in any such jurisdiction.

  • LAW AND FORUM Any dispute related to or arising out of this Limited Warranty, including without limitation any question regarding its existence, validity, breach, or termination, shall be referred to and finally resolved pursuant to the governing law clauses and dispute resolution procedures under the purchase agreement between the original purchaser and ▇▇▇▇▇. As a condition to any obligation of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Jinko may require any Customer seeking to enforce this Limited Warranty to execute such additional agreements as may reasonably be required to enforce the terms of this Section 11.

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both parties to this agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.