SO ORDERED Sample Clauses

SO ORDERED. Dated: The Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx X. Pallmeyer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX, et al., Plaintiffs,
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SO ORDERED. THE XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX X. URBANSKI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE REVIEWED AND AGREED TO BY: XXXXXX X. XXXXXX UNITED STATES ATTORNEY _/s/Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Assistant United States Attorney Western District of Virginia
SO ORDERED. On 18 May 2007, petitioner filed a Motion for Reconsideration,18 which was denied in an Order19 dated 16 August 2007. Xxxxxxxxx, petitioner appealed to the CA on 19 December 2007.20 On 17 March 2010, the CA rendered a Decision21 in favor of private respondent, as follows: In fine, public respondent SSC had sufficient basis in concluding that private respondent’s husband was an employee of petitioner and should, therefore, be entitled to compulsory coverage under the Social Security Law. Having ruled in favor of the existence of employer-employee relationship between petitioner and the late Xxxxx Xxxx, it is no longer necessary to dwell on the other issues raised. Resultantly, for his failure to report Xxxxx Xxxx for compulsory social security coverage, petitioner should bear the consequences thereof. Under the law, an employer who fails to report his employee for social security coverage is liable to [1] pay the benefits of those who die, become disabled, get sick or reach retirement age; [2] pay all unpaid contributions plus a penalty of three percent per month; and [3] be held liable for a criminal offense punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. But an 17 CA rollo, pp. 79-87. 18 Xxxxx, pp. 108-110. 19 Id. at 107. 20 Id. at 37-52. 21 Id. at 54-65. employee is still entitled to social security benefits even is (sic) his employer fails or refuses to remit his contribution to the SSS. WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Resolution appealed from is AFFIRMED in toto. SO ORDERED. In holding thus, the CA gave credence to the findings of the SSC. The appellate court held that it “does not follow that a person who does not observe normal hours of work cannot be deemed an employee.”22 For one, it is not essential for the employer to actually supervise the performance of duties of the employee; it is sufficient that the former has a right to wield the power. In this case, petitioner exercised his control through an overseer in the person of Xxxxx Xxxxxx, the tenant on petitioner’s land.23 Most important, petitioner entered into a Compromise Agreement with private respondent and expressly admitted therein that he was the employer of the deceased.24 The CA interpreted this admission as a declaration against interest, pursuant to Section 26, Rule 130 of the Rules of Court.25 Hence, this petition. Public respondents SSS26 and SSC27 filed their Comments on 31 January 2011 and 28 February 2011, respectively, while private respondent filed her Comment on 14 March 2011.28 O...
SO ORDERED. Date: XXX. XXXX X. MARTINEZ
SO ORDERED. It is hereby certified by this Board that the above language is a copy of the Order entered upon its journal in this case. Section 119.12 of the Ohio Revised Code authorizes an appeal from this Order. An order that denied admission to an examination, or denied the issuance or renewal of a license or registration, or revoked or suspended a license, may be appealed to the court of common pleas in the Ohio county of your place of business or in your Ohio county of residence. Any other order may be appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio. Such an appeal, setting forth the order appealed from and the grounds of the appeal, must be commenced by the filing of a Notice of Appeal with both the State Board of Pharmacy and the appropriate court within fifteen (15) days after the mailing of this Order and in accordance with the requirements of Section 119.12 of the Ohio Revised Code. CERTIFIED MAIL/Return Receipt 0000 0000 0000 9804 6282 BY ORDER OF THE STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY ORDER MAILED & EFFECTIVE: OCTOBER 12, 2006 By:
SO ORDERED. Judge Magistrate Dated
SO ORDERED. XxxxxxxxXXxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx, XxxxxxXXxxxxxx, and Xxxxxx, XX., concur. THE MANILA HOTEL CORP. AND MANILA HOTEL INTL. LTD., petitioners, vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ARBITER XXXXXXXX X. XXXXXXX AND XXXXXXX X. XXXXXX, respondents. XXXXX, X.: The case before the Court is a petition for certiorari1 to annul the following orders of the National Labor Relations Commission (hereinafter referred to as "NLRC") for having been issued without or with excess jurisdiction and with grave abuse of discretion:2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to SO ORDERED

  • No Order No Governmental Entity shall have enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any statute, rule, regulation, executive order, decree, injunction or other order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) which is in effect and which has the effect of making the Merger illegal or otherwise prohibiting consummation of the Merger.

  • No Orders Neither Parent nor Merger Sub is subject to any order of any kind or nature that would prevent or materially delay the consummation of the Merger or the ability of Parent and Merger Sub to fully perform their respective covenants and obligations pursuant to this Agreement.

  • Final Order If the Interim Order is obtained and the Arrangement Resolution is approved at the Company Meeting in accordance with the terms of the Interim Order, the Company shall take all steps necessary to submit the Arrangement to the Court and diligently pursue an application for the Final Order pursuant to section 182 of the OBCA, as soon as reasonably practicable, but in any event not later than three Business Days, after the Arrangement Resolution is passed at the Company Meeting as provided for in the Interim Order.

  • Sale Order The Sale Order shall, among other things, (a) approve, pursuant to sections 105, 363 and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, (i) the execution, delivery and performance by Sellers of this Agreement, (ii) the sale of the Acquired Assets to Buyer on the terms set forth herein and free and clear of all Encumbrances (other than Permitted Encumbrances), and (iii) the performance by Sellers of their obligations under this Agreement, (b) authorize and empower Sellers to assume and assign to Buyer the Transferred Contracts, (c) find that Buyer is a “good faith” purchaser within the meaning of section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code, find that Buyer is not a successor to any Seller, and grant Buyer the protections of section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code, (d) find that Buyer shall have no Liability or responsibility for any Liability or other obligation of any Seller arising under or related to the Acquired Assets other than as expressly set forth in this Agreement, including successor or vicarious Liabilities of any kind or character, including any theory of antitrust, environmental, successor, or transferee Liability, labor law, de facto merger, or substantial continuity, (e) find that Buyer has provided adequate assurance (as that term is used in section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code) of future performance in connection with the assumption of the Transferred Contracts, (f) find that Buyer shall have no Liability for any Excluded Liability, (g) find that the consideration provided by Buyer pursuant to this Agreement constitutes reasonably equivalent value and fair consideration for the Acquired Assets, (h) find that Buyer and Sellers did not engage in any conduct which would allow this Agreement to be set aside pursuant to section 363(n) of the Bankruptcy Code and (i) order that, notwithstanding the provisions of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedures 6004(h) and 6006(d), the Sale Order is not stayed and is effective immediately upon entry. Buyer agrees that it will promptly take such actions as are reasonably requested by any Seller to assist in obtaining Bankruptcy Court approval of the Sale Order, including furnishing affidavits or other documents or information for filing with the Bankruptcy Court for purposes, among others, of (A) demonstrating that Buyer is a “good faith” purchaser under section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code and (B) establishing adequate assurance of future performance within the meaning of section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

  • COMPETENT SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY Identify the competent supervisory authority/ies in accordance with Clause 13 … ANNEX II - TECHNICAL AND ORGANISATIONAL MEASURES INCLUDING TECHNICAL AND ORGANISATIONAL MEASURES TO ENSURE THE SECURITY OF THE DATA EXPLANATORY NOTE: The technical and organisational measures must be described in specific (and not generic) terms. See also the general comment on the first page of the Appendix, in particular on the need to clearly indicate which measures apply to each transfer/set of transfers. Description of the technical and organisational measures implemented by the data importer(s) (including any relevant certifications) to ensure an appropriate level of security, taking into account the nature, scope, context and purpose of the processing, and the risks for the rights and freedoms of natural persons. [Examples of possible measures: • Measures of pseudonymisation and encryption of personal data • Measures for ensuring ongoing confidentiality, integrity, availability and resilience of processing systems and services • Measures for ensuring the ability to restore the availability and access to personal data in a timely manner in the event of a physical or technical incident • Processes for regularly testing, assessing and evaluating the effectiveness of technical and organisational measures in order to ensure the security of the processing • Measures for user identification and authorisation • Measures for the protection of data during transmission • Measures for the protection of data during storage • Measures for ensuring physical security of locations at which personal data are processed • Measures for ensuring events logging • Measures for ensuring system configuration, including default configuration • Measures for internal IT and IT security governance and management • Measures for certification/assurance of processes and products • Measures for ensuring data minimisation • Measures for ensuring data quality • Measures for ensuring limited data retention • Measures for ensuring accountability • Measures for allowing data portability and ensuring erasure]

  • Final Approval Order 62. The Parties shall jointly seek entry of a Final Approval Order, the text of which the Parties shall agree upon. The dismissal orders, motions or stipulation to implement this Section shall, among other things, seek or provide for a dismissal with prejudice and waiving any rights of appeal.

  • Court Orders ICANN will respect any order from a court of competent jurisdiction, including any orders from any jurisdiction where the consent or non-­‐objection of the government was a requirement for the delegation of the TLD. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, ICANN’s implementation of any such order will not be a breach of this Agreement

  • Pre-Ordering In accordance with FCC and Commission rules and orders, BellSouth will provide electronic access to the following pre-ordering functions: service address validation, telephone number selection, service and feature availability, due date information and customer record information. Access is provided through the Local Exchange Navigation System (LENS) interface and the Telecommunications Access Gateway (TAG) interface. Customer record information includes customer specific information in XXXX and RSAG. TelSouth shall provide to BellSouth access to customer record information, including circuit numbers associated with each telephone number where applicable. TelSouth shall Version R1Q03; 03/04/03 provide such information within four (4) hours after request via electronic access where available. If electronic access is not available, TelSouth shall provide to BellSouth paper copies of customer record information, including circuit numbers associated with each telephone number where applicable. If BellSouth requests the information before noon, the customer record information shall be provided the same day. If BellSouth requests the information after noon, the customer record information shall be provided by noon the following day.

  • Product Orders Product orders submitted by the Representative shall be deemed to be an offer to purchase by the purchaser, and are subject to final approval and acceptance by Ilios at its Home Office in Waltham, Massachusetts.

  • Proceedings; Orders (a) Except as set forth in Part 3.25 of the Disclosure Schedule, there is no pending Proceeding, and no Person has threatened to commence any Proceeding:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.