Security Classif Clause Samples

Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 113 22. Price Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized Many representatives from the Seattle/LWC Urban partnership agencies as well as the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration regional offices provided much appreciated support to the national evaluation team’s efforts to develop this plan. The efforts of the following individuals were particularly instrumental in collecting the technical information needed to develop the evaluation plan and their assistance is recognized and appreciated: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Washington State Department of Transportation; ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ County; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Puget Sound Regional Council; and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Engineering (consultant to Washington State Department of Transportation). Background vii The Seattle/LWC UPA viii Evaluation Analyses and Test Plans ix Next Steps xii
View Source
Security Classif. (of this report) Un-classified 20. Security Classif. (of this page) Un-classified 21. No. of Pages 59 22. Price Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized
View Source
Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 92 22. Price Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized Many individuals from the San Francisco partnership were helpful during the course of development of the evaluation plan. The following individuals were particularly instrumental in providing information and insight and their contribution is both recognized and appreciated: ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ of the San Francisco Metropolitan Transportation Authority; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ of the San Francisco County Transportation Agency; and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Background vii The San Francisco UPA vii Evaluation Analyses and Test Plans x Next Steps xii
View Source
Security Classif. (of this report) 20. SECURITY CLASSIF. (of this page) 21. NO. OF PAGES 22.
View Source
Security Classif. (of this report) Unclassified 20. Security Classif. (of this page)Unclassified 21. No. of Pages 16 22. Price This publication is based on the results of ICT-R27-95, Field Evaluation of Smart Sensor Vehicle Detectors at Intersections and Railroad Crossings. ICT-R27-95 was conducted in cooperation with the Illinois Center for Transportation; the Illinois Department of Transportation; the Illinois Commerce Commission; and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Members of the Technical Review Panel are the following: ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, IDOT (Chair) ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ICC (Co-chair) ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, IDOT ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, IDOT ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, IDOT ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, IDOT ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, IDOT ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, FHWA The contents of this report reflect the view of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Illinois Center for Transportation, the Illinois Department of Transportation, or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Trademark or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of this document and do not constitute an endorsement of product by the Federal Highway Administration, the Illinois Department of Transportation, or the Illinois Center for Transportation.
View Source

Related to Security Classif

  • Security Cameras Security cameras have been installed throughout the Facility; however, they will not routinely be used in areas where there is an expectation of privacy, such as restrooms or patient care areas.

  • Security Clearances A. The General Contractor is to supply the Court with names, dates of birth, and social security numbers of all employees who will be on site. This information must be submitted one (1) week prior to access to the site. The Court has final word on who will or who will not be allowed on the project premises.

  • Security Clearance 6.7.1 Where specified by the Authority or the Contract user, the Supplier shall be responsible for ensuring that all Staff are security cleared to the level required by the Security Requirements not less than 5 Working Days before such person begins to perform the Services. If the Authority is responsible for applying for security clearance for Staff pursuant to this Clause 6.7.1, the Supplier shall provide a completed security clearance application form for such members of Staff to the Authority not less than 30 days before such members of Staff begin to perform the Services. 6.7.2 The Authority shall issue a pass for all Staff who are security cleared to an appropriate level for the Premises in accordance with Clause 6.7.1 on or before the date when such member of Staff is required to enter onto the Premises in Order to perform the Services. Passes shall remain the property of the Authority and shall be surrendered on demand or on termination or expiry of this Contract. 6.7.3 A member of Staff not in possession of a pass who is required by the Supplier or any Sub-contractor to provide the services urgently shall be allowed temporary access to the Premises on condition that the Supplier ensures, or procures that any Sub- contractor shall ensure, that such individual is accompanied at all times while on the Premises by a member of Staff who has been issued with a pass in accordance with Clause 6.7.1. 6.7.4 Without prejudice to the provisions of Clauses 6.7.1 to 6.7.3 inclusive, the Authority may refuse any member of Staff Admission to the Premises or require the removal of any member of Staff from the Premises in accordance with Clause 3.3 if such member of Staff is not in possession of a pass pursuant to Clause 6.7.2 or accompanied in accordance with Clause 6.7.3.

  • Contractor Security Clearance Customers may designate certain duties and/or positions as positions of “special trust” because they involve special trust responsibilities, are located in sensitive locations, or have key capabilities with access to sensitive or confidential information. The designation of a special trust position or duties is at the sole discretion of the Customer. Contractor or Contractor’s employees and Staff who, in the performance of this Contract, will be assigned to work in positions determined by the Customer to be positions of special trust, may be required to submit to background screening and be approved by the Customer to work on this Contract.

  • Tax Classification The Series shall elect to be treated as an association taxable as a corporation under Treasury Regulations Section 301.7701-3 with effect for each taxable period of its existence. The Series and each Member shall file all tax returns and shall otherwise take all tax and financial reporting positions in a manner consistent with such treatment. No election will be filed with the Internal Revenue Service (or the tax authorities of any State) to have the Series taxable other than as an association taxable as a corporation for income tax purposes.