Second Iteration. CUSTOMER shall pay for any correction or modification to the Prototypes, including, but not limited to the cost of making new masks. In a case where the modification is limited to the metal layers, CUSTOMER shall provide the revision mask layers as required. In a case where the modification is not limited to the metal layers, CUSTOMER shall pay a dollar amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the original nonrecurring engineering charges set forth in Section 3.1.
Second Iteration. The second session took place on 05/06/2014 and again comprised all four test groups. For Test Group 1 three test cases had to be marked as failed (cf. Table 31): Table 31: Second iteration - test verdicts summary Test Group 1 Test Case Title Verdict Overallverdict TC_EXT_SO_01 Input meeting reservation at the meeting reservation tool YES YES PASS TC_EXT_SO_02 Meeting reservation tool informs CMS about starting of meeting NO NO NO FAIL TC_EXT_SO_03 CMS starts HVAC through IoT6 GW YES YES PASS TC_EXT_SO_04 Receive sensor value at Local CMS YES PASS TC_EXT_SO_05 Send message to Meeting Reservation Tool for room access YES NO FAIL TC_EXT_SO_06 Grant access to meeting attendants NO NO YES NO YES FAIL • TC_EXT_SO_01: The creation of a meeting in the Meeting Reservation Tool has been provided and the associated test case passed. • TC_EXT_SO_02: The scheduling mechanism that should start HVAC 15 minutes before the start of the meeting has not yet been working and no message is sent to the Local CMS. To continue testing, it was at this point assumed that test verdict 2 of TC_EXT_SO_02 was correctly working and thus the Local CMS received a correct message. • TC_EXT_SO_05: As the IPv6 address of the Meeting Reservation Tool server had changed, it was unreachable. Therefore, it was not possible to send a message to the Meeting Reservation Tool. • TC_EXT_SO_06: This test case also involves the Meeting Reservation Tool, and therefore also failed. Also validating test verdict 4 by only testing the communication between Local CMS and IoT6 Gateway still failed as no command message is sent to close the door opener. For Test Group 2 in the second iteration, three test cases were identified to be failing (cf. Table 32): Table 32: Second iteration - test verdicts summary Test Group 2 Test Case Title Verdict Overallverdict TC_EXT_SO_07 Discovery of nearby sensors and actuators YES YES YES YES YES PASS TC_EXT_SO_08 Verify the correct execution of a preference update to several heterogeneously integrated devices YES YES YES YES YES YES PASS TC_EXT_SO_09 Observation of environmental value at mobile device and selection of corresponding rule NO NO YES YES FAIL TC_EXT_SO_10 Rule application and value adjustment according to predefined rule YES YES YES YES PASS TC_EXT_SO_11 Observation and classification of weather situation with respect to to photovoltaic energy generation YES YES YES YES YES YES PASS TC_EXT_SO_12 Heating control according to observed weather situation NO NO NO N...
