Safety Study Clause Samples
A Safety Study clause outlines the requirements and procedures for conducting studies to assess the safety of a product, process, or activity. Typically, it specifies who is responsible for performing the study, the standards or protocols to be followed, and the reporting obligations for any safety findings or incidents. For example, it may require a manufacturer to conduct clinical trials or risk assessments before a product is released to the market. The core function of this clause is to ensure that safety risks are systematically identified and managed, thereby protecting users and reducing liability for the parties involved.
Safety Study. The BOARD shall conduct an in-depth safety study to increase safety at crosswalks and corners, and update the same as needed.
Safety Study. The Traffic Operations office is responsible for reducing crashes through the implementation of engineering countermeasures. Therefore, the study’s goal is to develop traffic operational strategies to enhance safety, while minimizing impact, if any, on traffic flow. As part of this assignment, the Consultant shall complete the following tasks consistent with the procedures and guidelines outlined in the FDOT MUTS Manual, MUTCD, HSIP and AASHTO:
1. Collect data relevant to the study location, example:
a. Crash data
b. Hard copies of police reports
c. High crash listing
d. Aerial photographs
e. Field inventory
f. Lighting levels (if night time crashes are the object of the study)
g. Other relevant data
2. Summarize the latest 3-year crash data by preparing crash summary tables
3. Review hard copies and:
a. Prepare collision diagrams
b. Ensure that there are no discrepancies between the police reports, the crash data, and the summary tables
4. Identify significant crash patterns
5. Conduct AM and/or PM peak hour field reviews to assess the existing safety and operational conditions
6. Develop engineering countermeasures to reduce number of crashes and/or the severity of the crash patterns identified while attempting to minimize any negative impact on operations.
7. Present findings at pre-Safety Review Committee meeting (pre-SRC)
8. Revise recommendations, if necessary, based on the input from the pre-SRC meeting and conduct a more detailed safety analysis based on the findings from steps 4 and 6. The findings from step 4 and 6 should not limit the reach of this detailed safety analysis.
9. Assess the constructability of the proposed improvements
10. Prepare an existing condition sketch based on the MUTS Manual
11. When impacts on operations are unavoidable, conduct an operational analysis of the existing and proposed conditions. The operational analysis shall be made using the most recent version of a traffic analysis software package approved by the project manager. The Consultant shall choose the software package based on the software’s ability to analyze the situation under consideration. The following software packages are considered as approved for general analysis:
a. Signal 2000: Approved for analysis of single/isolated intersections
Safety Study. Initial MAA Approval for the Existing Product in the European Union is accompanied by a post approval commitment requiring that an open label safety study in on label patient populations be carried out on the committed timelines with respect to the Existing Product (“Safety Study”), as further specified in Exhibit 7.1.1. Astellas shall be solely responsible for planning and overseeing the performance of the Safety Study and liaising with the regulatory authorities, provided that Astellas shall keep the JDC informed about all study activities and provided that Astellas shall give reasonable consideration to any comments of the JDC. [***].
Safety Study. The District Safety office is responsible for reducing crashes through the implementation of engineering countermeasures. Therefore, the study's goal is to develop traffic operational strategies to enhance safety, while minimizing impact, if any, on traffic flow. As part of this assignment, the Consultant shall complete the following tasks consistent with the procedures and guidelines outlined in the FDOT MUTS Manual, FDOT Traffic Engineering Manual, MUTCD, HSIP, AASHTO and any other technical publications approved by the FDOT:
1. Collect data relevant to the study location, example:
a. Crash data
b. Hard copies of police reports
c. High crash listing
d. Aerial photographs
e. Field inventory
f. Lighting levels (if nighttime crashes are the object of the study)
g. Other relevant data
2. Summarize the latest 3-year crash data or 5-year of crash data as needed by preparing crash summary tables
3. Review hard copies of critical crash types as needed and:
a. Prepare collision diagrams
b. Ensure that there are no discrepancies between the police reports, the crash data, and the summary tables
4. Identify significant crash patterns
5. Conduct AM and/or PM peak hour field reviews to assess the existing safety and operational conditions
6. Develop engineering countermeasures to reduce number of crashes and/or the severity of the crash patterns identified while attempting to minimize any negative impact on operations.
7. Present findings to the District Safety office.
8. Revise recommendations, if necessary, based on the input from the Department.
9. Assess the constructability of the proposed improvements
10. Prepare an existing condition sketch based on the MUTS Manual
11. When impacts on operations are unavoidable, conduct an operational analysis of the existing and proposed conditions. The operational analysis shall be made using the most recent version of a traffic analysis software package approved by the project
Safety Study. The Union will have the availability to use other (Canada) Ltd. Branches for a study on safety, health and W.C.B, issues that are a concern in the work place. If will be done in a manner that it will not interfere with the operations of the Branches.