Review Methodology Sample Clauses
Review Methodology. A systematic literature review (SLR) is used for this study as it is an overview of primary studies using explicit and reproducible methods (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 1997) following a rigorous search procedure. The five steps followed for this kind of study (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al., 2019; ▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al., 2017) includes: Formulation of the research question, Studies location (searching studies by keywords definition and database selection), Selection and evaluation of studies using inclusion/exclusion criteria, Analysis and summary of the selected articles and results, and Reporting and use of results for further action. This approach is particularly useful for analysing a field or a topic where numerous studies have already been published but the overall picture is still fragmented and variegated, and there is the need to detect the key points of the actual and potential research. In coherence with these typical SLR steps, the adopted SLR strategy is described below.
Review Methodology. The final evaluation will determine the effects and impact that the ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ activities and outputs have had on FHI's Title II programs. The evaluation will be both quantitative and qualitative and will be implemented during the first quarter of the last program year (October-December 2002). The evaluation will rely primarily on qualitative methods including, but not limited to, semi-structured interviews, direct observation, focus groups, and secondary data review. Additional sources of information for the evaluation will include monitoring project data and recommendations made in the mid-term review. Through participatory methods a multi-disciplinary team composed of an external consultant (team leader) and FHI headquarters staff will examine FHI’s ISA program results. A visit to three Title II fields will allow field staff and beneficiaries to provide their inputs to the review process. The final evaluation will be conducted in three stages:
Review Methodology